oops, the new R6 doesnt actually rev to 17,500
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.r6-forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22594">http://www.r6-forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22594</a><!-- m -->
OUCH. My friend who just bought one is going to be pissed. Well at least they were honest and offered to buy the bikes back. I wonder how many companies would actually try to do that.
Those bikes are still fast as hell though, damn.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
I dont think it matters worth a damn - its still going to be way more bike than most riders are capable of exploiting. I wouldnt buy one because of the lack of (nonexistant) mid range power. Seems silly to have a street bike that wont get out of its own way coming out of a corner if the tach isnt above 10k rpm.
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
It's not like this should come as a surprise.
Historically a bike's tach doesn't register very accurately. It just happens that the marketing guys made a campaign off this one.
If you're really going to return your bike over a paper statistic than it's actual performance then you're a moron, anyways.
When it comes to Ryan Jenkins, the story ends with me putting him in the wall.
2009 Speed Triple | 2006 DR-Z400SM | 1999 CBR600F4 | 1998 Jeep Cherokee
-Ginger