Tell me my options(Now with a few pics!)
#41
I found a '05 Legact GT with 8k mles, got the guy down to 20 flat. Thinking about jumping on it.
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#42
HAULN-SS Wrote:I found a '05 Legact GT with 8k mles, got the guy down to 20 flat. Thinking about jumping on it.

Sounds like a great damn deal, what is teh curb weight of those?
2017 Mineral White BMW M240i Cabriolet
2014 White Platinum Pearl Explorer Sport

Living in the Alamo City.
210
  Reply
#43
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.google.com">http://www.google.com</a><!-- m -->
I Am Mike
4 wheels:  '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)

No longer onyachin.
  Reply
#44
HAULN-SS Wrote:I found a '05 Legact GT with 8k mles, got the guy down to 20 flat. Thinking about jumping on it.

Hell of a deal, color??? if its white ill race you to it. j/k
  Reply
#45
Legacy GT for the more pimp daddy feel, WRX / STI / EVO for the sportier feel. Clearly I'm biased towards Subarus, but technically what I drive really isn't a Subaru anymore so I don't have much room to talk.

I've also heard the RX8 is slow as balls in a straight line, which is sort of a take it for what it's worth thing. To some people that is important.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#46
Silver/charcoal interior..its that nylon mesh or whatever though - not leather. Still has pretty good optiosn though. 5 spd, 2.5l turbo, blah blah blah
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#47
i'd jump on it dude
2010 Civic Si
2019 4Runner TRD Off-Road
--------------------------
Past:  03 Xterra SE 4x4  |  05 Impreza 2.5RS  |  99.5 A4 Quattro 1.8T  |  01 Accord EX  |  90 Maxima GXE  |  96 Explorer XLT
  Reply
#48
3300lbs by the way. 13.5 power to weight , same for torque
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#49
New GTs are nice dude, they share a lot of the same traits as the STI, but in a more refined, luxurious way. You can modify the hell out of them, just like any other boosted Subaru too.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#50
from what ive heard they are about $1k away from 300hp
  Reply
#51
Evan Wrote:
Ryan T Wrote:[
Spot on, pretty much every car in its price range can out accelerate it and most get better fuel economy.

Evan, I was hoping you wouldn't resort to personal attacks..."used to jacking off over mad tiiiite dyno supras dawg", come on. I didn't mean to push any of your buttons with my post, and if I did I apologize.

Perhaps "real sports cars" wasn't the best phrase to use, I should have said cars with real power. I have no doubt the rx-8 could bust some ass around a road course, but the power leaves MUCH to be desired, especially when you can have more performance and better fuel economy for less money.
Ok Ryan, but how did you expect for me to take "If the RX-8 has the best top-end of any car that you've driven then you really need to drive some real sports cars, because the top end of the rx-8 is far from impressive."
You need to learn the difference between "You are wrong and you dont know anything!" and "I disagree"
As I already said you should know better than to justify a statement with a street race, Im not sure what kind of response you expected with that. You gave me flashbacks to the good old days of Travis flaming.

I hate magazine racing, but since its already been brought up (although without references of course :rollSmile, On Top Gear the RX-8 matched the 350Z time while being easier to drive and more consistent. Someone explain to me how that is much less performance? The car has no balls before 5k, which on a test drive (or a fat 45 year old magazine journalist review) is going to fell pretty damn slow. But last I checked, we were motorsports enthusiasts, not fat middle aged men. Personally I love high revving engines. It comes alive around 5.5 and yes, it pulls like crazy all the way to 9k. Its a driver's car, it has a relatively low weight considering the pigs being built today, it has a real LSD and is completely balanced. I guess you guys would rather have low drag times to brag to your friends about than a real drivers car. How sad.
Fuel economy I cant speak for, but Allison hasn't complained too much about her's, although I wouldnt be surprised if it isnt the best. The suspension is more solid than a WRX's, and feels just as stiff as a STi.
And dont mistake me for a rotary fanboi. I have always hated them, especially when I get stuck behind one on a racetrack.

ps- google video didnt turn up the top gear rx-8 segment, but i have it at home in case anyone wants to see it


You are first off ignoring that I TESTED MYSELF EVERY ONE OF THOSE VEHICLES and yes I did beat up on them. I stand by my statements, dont bullshit and tell me I only read or saw or heard something.

Second, in that Top Gear Episode of the RX-8, where Tish (or whatever his name was) says that the car's suspension is way too soft and is nowhere near the sporty suspension it should be.

Yes, real LSD? And what would that be? Whats your definition of an LSD??? VLSD? Torsen? 2-way? Clutch-Type? OR wait...this is what Mazda says off its LSD....its a Super LSD, no bullshit that is on their official press release of the vehicle....Super LSD. hahahah. Oh and weight? 3000lbs is not exactly lightweight. Why dont you shove that whole thinking out of your head.... The rx-8 has less power and weighs more than an s2000 for the same price. A 350z is a heavy and non-track car, its way too heavy, yet....it still is around the same times as the rx-8? Thats pretty good, considering the only advantage to rotary at this time (since fuel consumption and horsepower is not as great) is the lightweight of it.....yet it is "keeping up" with this heavy ass brute the 350z, which I even said was slow and way too heavy. Jesus my car is 3100 pounds, with AWD, all the same features as the rx-8 (leather sunroof, 8 speaker audio, 4 seats) and has around the same horsepower. Yet mine has awd and better fuel consumption. Goddamn even 6 years technological time has gone by and it doesnt even have a better drag coefficient of my car (.29-.30 depends on review). The rx-8 is just another useless technological toy that will fall to the wayside while the rx-7 was light, had a much better tracl suspension, and had way more horsepower. Yeah, it burns oil, so does the rx-8, look in the owner's manual. The fuel consumption? Who cares when the rx-7 was so fast in straight-line and corners? Rx-8s saving grace????? NOTHING! A fat brute posts the same track times, is much faster straight line, gets better gas mileage, and can be worked on any mechanic in the known world.....Thumbs down to the rx-8. Cool, but nevertheless a complete failure in what should have been a lighter, 2 door car with more power and a suspension paired with lighter components.
  Reply
#52
Well DJ he wasn't really addressing you since you had driven several of the cars in the range for comparison's sake.

I think its neither fair nor relevant to compare the RX-8 to the RX-7 since they were not built for the same purpose nor in the same price range. Saying that the RX-8 failed because it doesn't match or exceed the performance of the RX-7 would be like saying the S2000 failed because it could not match/exceed the performance of the NSX.

When comparing the 8 to the 350Z you have to take into account that the 8 seats 4 comfortably where the Z is only a 2 seater. Sure the 8 can't run with the Evo and STi but there really isn't anything that can for the money.

The RX-8 is not the right car for everyone but its far from being a complete failure or any of the other pejoratives you used.
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#53
G.Irish Wrote:When comparing the 8 to the 350Z you have to take into account that the 8 seats 4 comfortably....

We talkin bout the same car??? Cause the RX8 i sat in had about as much room as a sardine can. You get a 6'3 driver/passenger and have someone sit in that back seat, see if it sits them comfortably then.
  Reply
#54
oh yeah, u get that GT yet????? i wanna see it.
  Reply
#55
Well where are you gonna put those extra 2 people in the Z? I guess you could take off the trunk and put two jump seats in there and make it an El CamZino.
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#56
i would never get a Z, id fork over the extra cash for a G35 coupe.
  Reply
#57
Yeah but that was not the point. The point was that the RX-8 matches up decently with the Z but can seat two more. You can bring the G35 into the discussion but that totally changes the parameters.
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#58
MMMM JDM Legacy....

[Image: img0883a36b4kpfqo.jpeg]

[Image: img6e077a024gjei7.jpeg]
  Reply
#59
Pics....Went by the bank today - looks like i'm going to get it, unless something weird happens, or I just dont like when I drive it.

[Image: May2006024.jpg]
[Image: May2006A010.jpg]
[Image: May2006A017.jpg]

[Image: i-2.jpg]
[Image: i-3.jpg]
[Image: i-4.jpg]
[Image: i-5.jpg]
[Image: i-6.jpg]
[Image: i-7.jpg]
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#60
i doubt you will be disappointed at all...is there anyway we could meet up and i could take a look at it cause im still tryin to decide between this and a EVO??
  Reply


Forum Jump: