12-20-2007, 12:41 PM
I still can't get over that this car is putting down at the wheels what Nissan claims it's putting down at the crank. I know dyno numbers are just arbitrary numbers in a lot of cases, and that Dynapacks usually read high, but irregardless that is some serious sandbagging no matter how you look at it.
With AWD drivetrain loss, those whp numbers should be like 100hp less than what that graph is showing.
With AWD drivetrain loss, those whp numbers should be like 100hp less than what that graph is showing.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks