New (to me) vehicle suggestions
#21
SlimKlim Wrote:
*insertusernamehere* Wrote:I agree with Joey but that one is too ugly. This is prettier, has 2 more cylinders and i mean.. have you ever listened one?

No warranty, horrifying maintenance costs ... Also, he wants to move up in technology features, an 07-08 is going to have the same stuff that his caddy has.

True, I say the 550 or the Lexus.
2013 Honda Fit, 1991 Mazda Miata, Princess Blanca, Mystery, 1993 Volvo 940 - sold, 2003 Mazda Protoge5 - carmax'd, 1996 BMW 328is - sold, 1996 Honda Accord - sold
  Reply
#22
Buy an ATS and sell it to me in two years
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#23
If I remember correctly you buy autos for your DDs - do you want another auto this time around? It's not in the same league as a CTS-V, but have you considered an SHO Smile If I was going for a baller DD I would probably cross shop the CTS / MKZ / SHO / 300c SRT8.
Why do people just post what they are thinking? Without thinking.

2012 Ford Mustang
1995 BMW 540i/A
1990 Eagle Talon TSI AWD
  Reply
#24
Jaguar XJR? How unreliable can a car with 30k miles be?
Why do people just post what they are thinking? Without thinking.

2012 Ford Mustang
1995 BMW 540i/A
1990 Eagle Talon TSI AWD
  Reply
#25
I didn't just try to push the IS-F because my buddy was selling one - I was honestly surprised when I drove it. It's not as fun as my M3 but it is a whole generation newer and much nicer for 95% of how any responsible human would use it. My least favorite things were the skinny steering wheel and single cheap thing on the dash: a random digital clock I think was yanked off my nightstand in 1992. The rest of the tech was nice.

My parents had an '07 CTS - base and the comfy suspension. Even though you have the bigger V6 and sporty suspension, the F is worlds different and seems it'd be up your alley.

Personally I don't know I'd want the same chassis twice in a row (+250hp or not). Worth a drive at least - I didn't think it was a boring Toyota by any stretch.

I wouldn't recommend an e60 M5 to anyone, but I'd consider one for myself. :twisted:
2001 M5
2016 M3
2014 Grand Cherokee

Been had: 1984 318i | 2003 S2000 | 1990 330is | 2005 STi | 2005 M3
  Reply
#26
I see you were thinking about a truck but decided the poor MPG was not worth it to you. What about dumping gas all together? For $40K you can buy a damn nice 2500 [insert brand here] diesel truck that is only a few years old. Heck I have a 2011 2500 SLT with all the good options only 11k on the clock for $40,500. Tuner and basic mods (keeping you legal) and you will have more then enough "fast" to worry about! 850lb/ft of torque is a computer plug away...and not even if you get a HO Cummins. Just a thought. Also, another thought...what about a 4 door wrangler? They are not fast and they are thirstyish but they are FUN and the mods and stuff for them goes on forever. Still haul people, pull a trailer if you need, anything. If you get a RAM or a Jeep remember that 2010 and newer have a 5 year 100k powertrain warranty that is a must for the price difference in most 09's to an 10. :thumbup:
Jeff Morrison - Used Car Manager
Woodstock Garage, Inc.
Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep - RAM

Current Stable of Mopar Junk
57 Chrysler Windsor 4drHT - 67 Dodge D100 Short Bed Step Side - 71 Dodge Challenger - 91 Chrysler Lebaron LX 33k mile Survivor - 91 Dodge Dakota V8 - 05 Chrysler Crossfire Roadster - 08 Ram 2500 Cummins
  Reply
#27
Let me second Adam on the big-body V8's. SRT has some fine offerings and you know how the Caddy's do.

Just buy the damn CTS-V.
Jeff Morrison - Used Car Manager
Woodstock Garage, Inc.
Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep - RAM

Current Stable of Mopar Junk
57 Chrysler Windsor 4drHT - 67 Dodge D100 Short Bed Step Side - 71 Dodge Challenger - 91 Chrysler Lebaron LX 33k mile Survivor - 91 Dodge Dakota V8 - 05 Chrysler Crossfire Roadster - 08 Ram 2500 Cummins
  Reply
#28
I love you guys, beautiful and terribly awesome advice all in one thread! haha

I want to check out that ISF BJ for sure. My brother test drove one before he bought his S4 and he said the motor had tons of power but the suspension was a little soft for him. For the type of driving i do i honestly don't mind a softer ride (obviously, i am driving a couch with wheels right now). For that reason i also really like the Ctsv idea. need to look through these other posts when i get home
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#29
Could you get a new enough AMG something in that range?

[Image: vorsteiner-mercedes-benz-2012-c63-amg-00.jpg]

Seriously though, I'm trying to think of a better time than now to buy the damn vette and I simply can't. I had my first as a DD before life took another direction and I loved it.
Current: 1985 LS1 Corvette | 2014 328i Wagon F31
Former: 2010 Ford Edge | 1999 Integra GS
I have a little bit of a rub near lock but if you are turned to lock on a track there are other problems already...
  Reply
#30
WRXtranceformed Wrote:I want to check out that ISF BJ for sure.
Sorry dude, just found out he sold it today.
2001 M5
2016 M3
2014 Grand Cherokee

Been had: 1984 318i | 2003 S2000 | 1990 330is | 2005 STi | 2005 M3
  Reply
#31
E9x m3 sedan?
  Reply
#32
JustinG Wrote:E9x m3 sedan?
Yes. After driving one with the smg I fell in love. That v8 sound is so unique and with so much power on tap/4 doors you can't beat it.
2019 Accord Sport 2.0 A/T
2012 Civic Si - Sold
  Reply
#33
I like the idea of a truck + sports car at some point in the future. I do have a couple of friends with trucks right now so it's not super imperative to get one but if we ever move out of the townhouse into a single family home it will make a lot of sense and I will probably get an old 'Yota to beat around in like I used to have.

Kaan Wrote:ITS MURRRRDDDDAR!

[Image: 1ZVBP8JSXC5238803_1.jpg]

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.carsforsale.com/used_cars_for_sale/2012_Ford_Mustang+Shelby+GT500_194608705_4">http://www.carsforsale.com/used_cars_fo ... 94608705_4</a><!-- m -->

I mean that is such an awesome car and I have wanted one ever since they came out. I would be heavily leaning that way except for the note below...

I'm definitely digging the ATS 2.0T, and the decision will ultimately be after the wedding later this year so hopefully they drop in price a bit on the used market as the new model year start to get close to coming out. It would require some mod work to make it performance wise where I want it to be...but tons of potential in that motor and the luxury technology is vastly improved in that caddy over mine.

The CTS-V makes as much if not more sense than the GT500, since they now cost about the same. The CTS-V is going to have similar power potential, a vastly superior suspension and a vastly superior interior / amenities list. When I started to compare the two it doesn't really make sense to get a GT500 since we are talking about a daily driver. The argument BJ made about the similar chassis is actually valid and I had thought about that.

I had not thought about the SHO but it just doesn't really do it for me, nor does the Lincoln or the SRT8. Jaguar is not going to happen. Really the only BMW I would consider in that price point is the M3 if one can be had for that much. I LOVED my brother's E9x M3 before he traded it on the prestige S4. This is super nitpicky but the modability of that car leaves some to be desired...considering every single mod has a ridiculous price tag. I like the idea on the CTSV of a few minor mods and a tune and it's +eleventybillion torques more than it was before. With that said I don't feel like any other BMW would make sense for me other than the M3.

I checked out that link BJ and that was a great price too, but it's all good I'm not quite at the trigger pull stage yet. I definitely have the IS-F among the top contenders due to power, reliability, looks other than the rear end, reasonable fuel economy and the fact that I hardly ever see any of them...even around here. Again super nitpicky but do they have cooled/ventilated seats? I didn't think I saw that option. That sounds weird but honestly it's one of the things that is hard for me to live without now especially with how hot it gets down here in the summer. Avoiding swamp ass to me is worth paying a premium for especially with leather seats. Maybe the newer MYs have it? If the older IS-Fs don't I would be surprised; the older IS250s even have them.

Jeeps are super cool don't get me wrong they are just not my style and not really what I am looking for. A buddy has a C63 AMGs and I have had the chance to hoon around a little in it. It is stupid fast and has one of the most ridiculous stock exhaust notes of any car I have ever heard. But he is getting absolutely nickled and dimed at the dealership maintaining that thing, not to mention I don't think Merc has any kind of included maintenance plans.

So what we have is:
- 2008-2010 IS-F
- 2009-2010 CTS-V
- 2013 ATS 2.0T
- E9x M3

That is a good start! I am not going to lie, I also thought about a twin turbo ($7k installed) or supercharger ($6k installed) kit on my car, but I would have to want to commit to this vehicle for much longer.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#34
After dinner with Rex last night, the CTS-V and ATS are at the #1 and #2 spots. Just such good value for the money
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#35
You're going to dump a CTS for CTS-V? I mean, I realize the V makes a difference, but I'd think alarms would be going off in your head. I feel like we're being punked or something.
'76 911S | '14 328xi | '17 GTI | In memoriam: '08 848, '85 944

"Here, at last, is the cure for texting while driving. The millions of deaths which occur every year due to the iPhone’s ability to stream the Kim K/Ray-J video in 4G could all be avoided, every last one of them, if the government issued everyone a Seventies 911 and made sure they always left the house five minutes later than they’d wanted to. It would help if it could be made to rain as well. Full attention on the road. Guaranteed." -Jack Baruth
  Reply
#36
Apoc Wrote:You're going to dump a CTS for CTS-V? I mean, I realize the V makes a difference, but I'd think alarms would be going off in your head. I feel like we're being punked or something.
I'm with this. Why not try something else or just spend the money to upgrade your CTS?
2019 Accord Sport 2.0 A/T
2012 Civic Si - Sold
  Reply
#37
JPolen01 Wrote:
Apoc Wrote:You're going to dump a CTS for CTS-V? I mean, I realize the V makes a difference, but I'd think alarms would be going off in your head. I feel like we're being punked or something.
I'm with this. Why not try something else or just spend the money to upgrade your CTS?
Upgrading his CTS himself would cost a pretty penny to get to CTS-V level performance, and that's money that would be lost in depreciation. Might as well start with the CTS-V.

Personally I would go ATS or E90 M3 if given the choice.
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#38
Dumping mod money into this car doesn't really make sense and Gerald hit the nail on the head...it would take stupid amounts to make it anywhere close to as complete of a car as the CTSV

Don't get me wrong, I am not far off from my opinion on the ATS. I originally bought my CTS because of a base rental I had...the same thing might happen with this car. The stop and go trafffic isn't nearly as bad here as it was in DC so a MT w/ LSD and magneto suspension daily isn't out of the question. It would be less of a consideration if Pfadt didn't have a 450hp kit for the car...modding would definitely happen to the ATS. And honestly as awesome as 556hp would be anything over 400whp for me would be PLENTY in a daily haha
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#39
I'm not saying full blown CTS V upgrade status. Just some mods to get him the tech he wants and maybe a little more power. I just don't see how buying the same car with a bit more power/tech would be fun.
2019 Accord Sport 2.0 A/T
2012 Civic Si - Sold
  Reply
#40
Get the CTS-V. Do you really think you're going to put those kind of mods into an ATS before it's out of warranty/you have traded it for something else? CTS-V also already has depreciation hit.
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply


Forum Jump: