05-16-2013, 09:31 AM
That seems really cheap!
" 255k miles "
Or not?
" 255k miles "
Or not?
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
|
Anybody know anything about Audi S4, 1994?
|
|
05-16-2013, 09:31 AM
That seems really cheap!
" 255k miles " Or not?
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
05-16-2013, 09:40 AM
BLAIR Wrote:Quit hatin on my car! It's a VW pretty much. That's how they all are and have always been! It's not at all built to handle anyways!!!Apparently not! As I stared at it though, I thought, well, having the engine forward of the drive wheels probably helps it put down power, rather than lifting the drive wheels under power like most FWD cars. :dunno: But yes, everything else would suffer I assume. Under braking does it tip forward and smash the bumper into the ground like one of those clown cars? :lol: :bootyshake:
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a van is a good guy with a van
05-16-2013, 03:09 PM
BLINGMW Wrote:Under braking does it tip forward and smash the bumper into the ground like one of those clown cars? :lol: :bootyshake: that's why they make them as heavy as tanks. ignore the obvious physics flaw in my logic.
I Am Mike
4 wheels: '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant) 2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red) No longer onyachin.
05-17-2013, 06:18 AM
Mike Wrote:ignore the obvious physics flaw in my logic. ...said every 911 Porsche engineer |