The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.22 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Madison Motorsports
Saturn Sky - Printable Version

+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Saturn Sky (/showthread.php?tid=2785)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


Saturn Sky - Mike - 09-11-2005

Fuck... just saw this thing on the tube. Hot looking car... Saturn reinventing their image?

170hp/163tq, 2.4L 4 banger, RWD...SHIT!

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/future_vehicles/sky.jsp?nav=710&flashOK=yes">http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/f ... lashOK=yes</a><!-- m -->

Could certainly use a turbo, but with 170hp and likely a lowish weight, this car is moneybags. RJ, buy one.


- .RJ - 09-11-2005

I think its fucking hot.... price should be under $20k.

Supposedly a turbo version in the works also, GM already has a turbo version of the engine in an Opel.

[Image: Saturn%20Sky.jpg]

[Image: SATURN_SKY_INTERIOR.JPG]

[Image: 158SKY_scenic2_1024-med.jpg]

[Image: 50003_450.74825_500.jpg]

[Image: avalon_1106819284_p_saturn_sky_saturn_5.jpg]

[Image: saturn2.jpg]


- Evan - 09-11-2005

same car as the pontiac solstice

but yeah, pretty hot. reminds me of the opel speedster


- WRXtranceformed - 09-11-2005

I think it looks awesome, especially the rear end. 170 hp seems a bit weak, but a turbo is always a good idea!


- .RJ - 09-11-2005

WRXtranceformed Wrote:but a turbo is always a good idea!

Something we can definately agree on Smile


- WRXtranceformed - 09-11-2005

.RJ Wrote:
WRXtranceformed Wrote:but a turbo is always a good idea!

Something we can definately agree on Smile

:thumbup: hehe!


- Feersty - 09-11-2005

Yup saw the commercial during the Redskins game. It like a C6 Mini me.

Definitely a hot looking car.


- John - 09-11-2005

Evan Wrote:reminds me of the opel speedster

Is it based off the same chassis? I saw several Speedsters at the 'Ring... seemed like a fun car.


- Evan - 09-11-2005

no, the speedster is mid engine and based off the elise


- Sijray21 - 09-11-2005

also just saw it on the football commercial today. I think it's pretty hot, i was wondering what it was. I actually thought it was opel and their roadster until i heard saturn Confusedhock:. I like the overall appearance (first saturn for me). A turbo with those numbers for n/a would be f-ing sweet.


- Mike - 09-11-2005

if it is based off the solstice... does the solstice also have plastic body panels? does the sky even have them? will it reduce the weight significantly?


- CaptainHenreh - 09-11-2005

Mike Wrote:if it is based off the solstice... does the solstice also have plastic body panels? does the sky even have them? will it reduce the weight significantly?

Saturn is phasing out the plastic body panels due to customer complaints about them. (Smell and fitment)

I'm holding out for the Nomad, a rumored 2 door hatch based on that platform.


- ScottyB - 09-11-2005

i think a used S2K would be a solid competitor to this car except that it wouldn't have as much time left on the warranty and such.

i hope the sky is successful, it would be nice to have a true domestic sportster-type of car in the mix


- Evan - 09-11-2005

the plastic panels smell?


I always figured that was just RJ.....


- .RJ - 09-11-2005

Lunchbox ownz j00!!!

Maybe its time for lunchbox v 3.0? Wink

[Image: wNjYxMjY2czQxM2RmZDMxeTU0MQ%3D%3D.jpg]


- Evan - 09-11-2005

doodoo brown


- .RJ - 09-11-2005

Dont hate, I still think I would have rolled j00r ass at CMP!


- Evan - 09-11-2005

now thats funny

even on my shitty sumitomos and 280 lb instructor i was still a couple seconds a lap faster

but why are we bench racing from 4 years ago? :lol:


- .RJ - 09-12-2005

Evan Wrote:but why are we bench racing from 4 years ago? :lol:

Because its even better than it was then! Wink


- Evan - 09-12-2005

jester0097: probably a good thing i crashed hte lunchbox
jester0097: otherwise i'd have a ugly plastic ITA car now ;-)
Ev V dOg: and now you just have an ugly ITA car