| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.30 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
MM Arlington House - Printable Version +- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org) +-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: MM Arlington House (/showthread.php?tid=3403) |
- Evan - 10-13-2006 there is no belief, only fact. do you have to specify chocolate oreos? oh hell no. An oreo is a damn oreo, just like a frosty is a frosty. No vanilla wannabe bullshit. Although your terrorist ass probably would prefer vanilla oreos too. - Apoc - 10-13-2006 Don't they have inside-out oreos now? I'm gonna buy a Vanilla Fakesty just so I can dump it onto the sidewalk. - Feersty - 10-13-2006 Sijray21 Wrote:it's an MM thread, does that post really need an explaination? lol If frosty = chocolate dessert then Vanilla Frosty = a swirlie so if you wanted vanilla flavored you would just say "Vanilla." - ScottyB - 10-13-2006 Feersty Wrote:If frosty = chocolate dessert *edit oh crap i just got what Feersty is saying* i'm actually laughing out loud at Jay and Evan right now, this is awesome - Evan - 10-13-2006 see Jason, Feersty gets it. - Maengelito - 10-15-2006 Apoc Wrote:Don't they have inside-out oreos now? i'll be the first to admit that vanilla oreos are delicious. but i wouldnt call them just oreos. you'd have to specify vanilla. |