| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.28 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
...and you thought Tysons had traffic now. - Printable Version +- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org) +-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: ...and you thought Tysons had traffic now. (/showthread.php?tid=5352) |
- Apoc - 01-25-2007 .RJ Wrote:So you spent $20k in interest to save $4000 in taxes. Yup... and I couldn't have rented this house for $1400/month so it was worth it. Round and round we go! - .RJ - 01-25-2007 But you could've rented it for less than $3000 ($1400 + $1600 interest) - Apoc - 01-25-2007 .RJ Wrote:But you could've rented it for less than $3000 ($1400 + $1600 interest) huh? My $1400 was my "true interest cost" divided by 12 months. Where do you get $3000? - .RJ - 01-25-2007 I misread... I thought $1400 (mortgage cost less interest) + $1600 (interest). Carry on
- .RJ - 11-29-2007 <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/29/news/economy/newhome_sales/index.htm">http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/29/news/ec ... /index.htm</a><!-- m --> Quote:NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The biggest plunge in new home prices in 37 years was not enough to revive October sales, according to the government's latest reading on the battered housing and home building markets. - Evan - 11-29-2007 13%+ drop in prices? sounds like i need to go house shopping. - .RJ - 11-29-2007 13% off $500k is still way too much - HAULN-SS - 11-29-2007 That doesn't say much, except that you can likely get more for your money. Good luck finding a "deal" on anything around here. In the end, your out of pocket will probably be the same, just on a better house. - G.Irish - 11-29-2007 .RJ Wrote:13% off $500k is still way too muchAnd its not over by far. Where is that thread where people were predicting that prices would drop by only 10-15%? - HAULN-SS - 11-29-2007 btw, that's 13% YoY...if houses were up 150% from say..2003 levels..you're not getting much of a deal anyway. I look for them to bottom out around 18% down from here, so another 5 - 8% off current prices. - Evan - 11-29-2007 .RJ Wrote:13% off $500k is still way too muchtrue. reading the patrick.net articles that cro posted have me back in a pessimistic mood now. The problem is that in this area the real estate market is much stronger, so predicting how much the market will fall is harder than the rest of the country. where is mikey's graph where he plotted avg home price vs salary? - .RJ - 11-29-2007 Evan Wrote:The problem is that in this area the real estate market is much stronger, so predicting how much the market will fall is harder than the rest of the country. West siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide That shit is going to implode... its already on its way. - Ginger - 11-29-2007 Nova's a really strong market for a lot of reasons.... it's not going to fall flat on it's face and become a first time home buyer free for all. Like, at all. Don't expect to see 50% cuts or anything. - HAULN-SS - 11-29-2007 asteele2 Wrote:Nova's a really strong market for a lot of reasons.... it's not going to fall flat on it's face and become a first time home buyer free for all. Like, at all. Don't expect to see 50% cuts or anything. Not to mention, most stats i've seen show it was actually devalued for a long time, so any correction is not going to be to pre-boom market levels, unless there was an overcorrection. - Ginger - 11-29-2007 HAULN-SS Wrote:asteele2 Wrote:Nova's a really strong market for a lot of reasons.... it's not going to fall flat on it's face and become a first time home buyer free for all. Like, at all. Don't expect to see 50% cuts or anything. Totally agreed. - Evan - 11-29-2007 interesting. So according to 1998 income to price ratio, median price should be around 275,000 now. If the market was in fact undervalued then, then that should push it up around 300,000k (and I seriously doubt an area with such a good job market would be that much under valued) Interest rates should affect this as well, so I will look up interest rates in 1998 vs now, but I doubt that will affect the numbers over 20k. edit: wtf, why is my post above his? - Mike - 11-29-2007 Evan Wrote:where is mikey's graph where he plotted avg home price vs salary? ![]() i can't find data to update it with i'm sure it hasn't changed much.
- Ginger - 11-29-2007 Evan Wrote:edit: wtf, why is my post above his? That kinda fucked me up, too. The housing market is notoriously hard to predict. All the data you could dig up could say that the value of houses here is unprecedented. I'm going to stick, w/relatively little data, with my assumption that prices here aren't going to crunch very much, though. Call it a hunch. Ninja Edit - I found this interesting (top more than bottom ):
- Evan - 11-29-2007 7.2% appreciation is way over what is realistic though. Typically long term the housing market is around 3-4% - G.Irish - 11-29-2007 asteele2 Wrote:Evan Wrote:edit: wtf, why is my post above his? That is graph trickery. If you divide the rise in price from the beginning of the graph to the end of the graph you get an average rise in price spread out over the time period. The problem is that the average is skewed significantly by the insane rise in price from 2000 on. If you plotted a trendline from 1979 to 2000 the average rise in price might be something more around 2 or 3% |