A locost is something I really do want to build someday. I've got all kinds of designs and engines in my head.
*sigh*
I'll probably do it sometime after I buy a house.
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
.RJ Wrote:Locost + Turbo 'Busa Engine = :twisted:
Weak.
SHO V6 + Ranger trans =
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
.RJ Wrote:CaptainHenreh Wrote:SHO V6 + Ranger trans =
:vomit:
Well, if you wanna rebuild your engine every 10k miles....
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
Why would you have to do that?
Taurus + Truck parts are big, heavy and dont make much power... and they dont have cool sequential gearboxes like bike motors.
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
.RJ Wrote:Why would you have to do that?
Taurus + Truck parts are big, heavy and dont make much power... and they dont have cool sequential gearboxes like bike motors.
They also don't have reverse. C'mon dude. I like bike motors and all, but I can get a SHO motor for like, 15 bucks and a pack of Pall Malls. A ranger transmission will run another six pack of Budweiser Select (for the
discriminating redneck.), where a 'busa motor + turbo = more money than I've got, that's for sure. AND, I'll have a reverse gear. Whao!!!11one
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
Well, you dont need the turbo... I think they make 175+ hp without one.
Reverse, is for pussies!
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
With a chassis / engine that light you could just get your girlfriend to push you out of parking spaces :lol:
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
