This is the dumbest thing I have seen on e-bay, and that is saying something.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7979381313&category=33597&sspagename=WDVW">http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... ename=WDVW</a><!-- m -->
Jeff Morrison - Used Car Manager
Woodstock Garage, Inc.
Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep - RAM
Current Stable of Mopar Junk
57 Chrysler Windsor 4drHT - 67 Dodge D100 Short Bed Step Side - 71 Dodge Challenger - 91 Chrysler Lebaron LX 33k mile Survivor - 91 Dodge Dakota V8 - 05 Chrysler Crossfire Roadster - 08 Ram 2500 Cummins
Thats fantastic
2008 Mazda 3
why don't you bid on it and see if it's a scam
Mouse
I am gettin one for the tow vehicle and TWO for my car!!!!!!!
Sean Thompson
NASA Mid-Atlantic Registrar
Scammer Wrote:.. not like the competitions 1 size fits all modules. Scammer Wrote:Will this module fit my 4cyl, 6cyl, 8cyl?
The Pro Choice Module will fit all engine sizes and types for this make of vehicle, providing they are fuel injected and not turbo or not diesel.
:lol:
Why do people just post what they are thinking? Without thinking.
2012 Ford Mustang
1995 BMW 540i/A
1990 Eagle Talon TSI AWD
ViPER1313 Wrote:Scammer Wrote:.. not like the competitions 1 size fits all modules. Scammer Wrote:Will this module fit my 4cyl, 6cyl, 8cyl?
The Pro Choice Module will fit all engine sizes and types for this make of vehicle, providing they are fuel injected and not turbo or not diesel.
:lol:
:!:
--
Aaron
"Early to bed and early to rise probably indicates unskilled labor." - John Ciardi
well.....
sadly, it could actually help. The description is of course a *little* trumped up and overpriced, since it's most likely just a variable resistor, but if you mess with the resistance of the coolant temp sensor in some cars, convincing the computer to dump in a little more fuel, that could lead to a bit more power.
So certianly not the worst thing I've seen, I think the air vanes and little intake fans and magnetic fuel line things are WAY worse.
BLINGMW Wrote:well.....
sadly, it could actually help. The description is of course a *little* trumped up and overpriced, since it's most likely just a variable resistor, but if you mess with the resistance of the coolant temp sensor in some cars, convincing the computer to dump in a little more fuel, that could lead to a bit more power.
So certianly not the worst thing I've seen, I think the air vanes and little intake fans and magnetic fuel line things are WAY worse.
How is running richer going to make more power :?:
i think what that does is advance your timing because if your engine is getting hot air it retards the timing to avoid knock, best air temp=best timing advance in the computer. That's just my understanding on how it works, could be wrong
Daily: 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STi, 2000 Honda S2000
AutoX/track: 1991 Honda CRX HF D15B, 1993 Honda Civic CX H2B 225whp@2120lbs
RallyX: 1997 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport
mpg9999 Wrote:How is running richer going to make more power :?:
running richer may or may not make power. But if your car is running shy of 13:1 on full throttle for some reason (the computer is setup for better fuel economy, intake and exhaust mods have lead to better air flow and the computer doesn't know what do do with it, or wear/broken stuff has lead to running a little lean) then this could get you back to a more ideal A/F ratio. COULD. It's just as likely to be misenterpreted by the computer, preventing closed loop operation, making things way too rich if you don't know what you're doing. Depends on the car too of course.
Quote: running richer may or may not make power. But if your car is running shy of 13:1 on full throttle for some reason (the computer is setup for better fuel economy, intake and exhaust mods have lead to better air flow and the computer doesn't know what do do with it, or wear/broken stuff has lead to running a little lean) then this could get you back to a more ideal A/F ratio. COULD. It's just as likely to be misenterpreted by the computer, preventing closed loop operation, making things way too rich if you don't know what you're doing. Depends on the car too of course.
What you are proposing is a little more than far fetched.
-T
MIHS - hot cause we fly you ain't so you not
2004 Subaru WRX STi
1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass
haha ok. From what I've read, it works on some Bosch injection systems, and people do it on old BMW's. That's about all I know. I have not tried it yet. But if you want more fuel from a car like mine, and you convince the computer that it's either colder (fuddling with temp senders) or there's more air (fuddling with the AFM), then you get more fuel. It's not far fetched at all. That's what the computer DOES. You change the inputs, and the output will change. I can't say at all that it'll work on a dodge. But if it's got a rather simplistic fuel injection system, then there's probably some way to fool it. And I don't know if this is anything but an empty box. But for $50, I'm guessing he at least bothered to goto radio shack and put a little variable resistor in there to actualy have some chance of making an effect on the buyer's car.
No one said it was far fetched to use devices that trick stock ecu's into delivering more or less fuel. What do you think an safc does all day long?
Your reasoning for how it could possibly make more power is far fetched.
Adding fuel is not going to make power without adding air.
-T
MIHS - hot cause we fly you ain't so you not
2004 Subaru WRX STi
1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass
KPWSerpiente Wrote:Your reasoning for how it could possibly make more power is far fetched. Adding fuel is not going to make power without adding air.
Maybe the air is already there? On our endurance car this past weekend there was a 2nd fuel pump... a BIG ONE. With it on lap times were 1-2 seconds faster. Flipping that switch did nothing more than dump more fuel in to the motor. Please don't bother to give me a chemistry lesson.
I Am Mike
4 wheels: '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)
No longer onyachin.
Mike Wrote:KPWSerpiente Wrote:Your reasoning for how it could possibly make more power is far fetched. Adding fuel is not going to make power without adding air.
Maybe the air is already there? On our endurance car this past weekend there was a 2nd fuel pump... a BIG ONE. With it on lap times were 1-2 seconds faster. Flipping that switch did nothing more than dump more fuel in to the motor. Please don't bother to give me a chemistry lesson.
Then it must have been running way to lean. You will make more power by leaning out the mixture to a point, not richening it.
Quote:The Prologixx Adj. Module has been shown and tested to increase:
1/4 Mile Time
0-60 Time
why would you want to increase them?
Rex4life Wrote:Quote:The Prologixx Adj. Module has been shown and tested to increase:
1/4 Mile Time
0-60 Time
why would you want to increase them? Haha, a bit of truth to the add I see.
mpg9999 Wrote:Mike Wrote:KPWSerpiente Wrote:Your reasoning for how it could possibly make more power is far fetched. Adding fuel is not going to make power without adding air.
Maybe the air is already there? On our endurance car this past weekend there was a 2nd fuel pump... a BIG ONE. With it on lap times were 1-2 seconds faster. Flipping that switch did nothing more than dump more fuel in to the motor. Please don't bother to give me a chemistry lesson.
Then it must have been running way to lean. You will make more power by leaning out the mixture to a point, not richening it.
Must have been... It didn't make much sense to me either, but the lap times proved simply dumping more fuel yielded better times.
I Am Mike
4 wheels: '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)
No longer onyachin.
mpg9999 Wrote:Then it must have been running way to lean. You will make more power by leaning out the mixture to a point, not richening it.
With the stock ECU I doubt it was running way too lean....
I cant really explain it either, usually you will make more power on the top end by leaning out the mixture. I would ass-u-me that this big ass porsche 930 turbo pump (that will support 600+ hp of *two* turbo fury) is bumping the fuel pressure up.
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
|
