New RX7 rumors
#1
from RX7City:
Quote: With the Mazda RX-8 officially on sale in its major markets, Mazda is now turning to its next sports-car project. The company has officially endorsed plans to build a rotary-powered RX-7 replacement.

In the footsteps of the 1978 original, it will be a sleek, lightweight two-seater. Some platform, suspension and driveline elements will be borrowed from the RX-8 parts bin. Although expected to launch in 2006, a concept may be unveiled at the Tokyo Motor Show next month.

An amped version of the Renesis RX-8 engine is likely to power the RX-7. With wider and stiffer rotor housings, a higher redline, and displacement out to about 1.6 litres, Mazda plans on output of around 300hp in the normally aspirated form. It appears there will be no turbocharged version. Fear not, though, as for the first time ever, Mazda is working on a supercharged rotary option for RX-7.

The production car, code-named J77, is likely to be shorter and wider than the RX-8. There may even be a cabriolet variant with a fabric or folding hard-top hood.

From RotaryNews
Quote:The new RX-7 has been confirmed as 'coming soon', by a lot of industry folks and automotive publications. We cannot confirm this, but RN does know that a product has been developed and is being considered for production, but there are no firm production plans yet. But, based on our limited information and insight, gathered at a few press events and talking to industry people, here are a few predictions and thoughts on the new RX-7.

* Larger displacement RENESIS motor with possible forced induction.
* 300+hp regardless of the motor being N/A or turbo/super charged.
* Lightweight (less than 2800lbs)
* Extremely high handling limits
* Unique styling and design
* No compromises

Mazda understands that any new vehicle carrying the RX-7 moniker will have live up to the 3rd generation FD RX-7. We have actually been told as much by key Mazda people. They understand all of the shortcomings, and more importantly, the streghtens of the FD, and will/have addressed and/or improved on them, as to not make the same mistakes twice. The new RX-7 will be a car designed and built with the spirit of the FD, through and through!

[Image: 21.jpg]
[Image: 22.jpg]
[Image: 200081.vmg]

This is entirely speculation of course :lol:
My Tumblr
2008 Felt F75 - Pedal Power
  Reply
#2
I'll take it! :mrgreen: (they can keep the 20's though)
  Reply
#3
not too bad.
The big question is price.

If its in the 40s, then it will die a quick death
SM #55 | 06 Titan | 12 Focus | 06 Exige | 14 CX-5
  Reply
#4
No b00st? :thumbdown:

Needs *two* turbos!
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
  Reply
#5
Um, they must be cutting corners cause it looks like they just grafted the front end of the 3 on there.

On price, it had better be a world beater if its above $30k. As for boost let's hope it gets at least one turbo...

"No compromises" ??? That is pure fantasy. Does this mean it is going to have carbon fiber body panels and 4 rotors?
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#6
Yeah hopefully it will be cheap.
2017 Mineral White BMW M240i Cabriolet
2014 White Platinum Pearl Explorer Sport

Living in the Alamo City.
210
  Reply
#7
are you guys even half serious about the "turbo" comments? If it really has over 300+ HP, and I'd have to guess close to 200 ft/lbs of torque, in a less than 2800 lb car, that would be a rocket! If it came in at less than 30k, I think that's PLENTY of performance considering what else is out there. Why deal with the extra mess and cost of a turbo if you don't have to?
  Reply
#8
because it is more fun.. you idiot!
I Am Mike
4 wheels:  '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)

No longer onyachin.
  Reply
#9
BLINGMW Wrote:are you guys even half serious about the "turbo" comments? If it really has over 300+ HP, and I'd have to guess close to 200 ft/lbs of torque, in a less than 2800 lb car, that would be a rocket! If it came in at less than 30k, I think that's PLENTY of performance considering what else is out there. Why deal with the extra mess and cost of a turbo if you don't have to?

I don't think they could bring it in at under $30k, the RX-8 is already like $28 and it barely makes 240 hp.

Sorry Chan...about the turbo thing. You see, I've been sick lately, with all this boost rot and...I've had a hard time thinking straight. Try to understand. Its not you, its me. Me and boost. And I don't think its going to change anytime soon. As a matter fact, its getting worse. Maybe it'd be best if you didn't consider me one of you naturally aspirated friends anymore Cry
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#10
mid to high 30s is probably about as cheap as we can hope for
SM #55 | 06 Titan | 12 Focus | 06 Exige | 14 CX-5
  Reply
#11
Oh man...I would love to see a supercharged 1.6 liter....rotary!

-T
MIHS - hot cause we fly you ain't so you not

2004 Subaru WRX STi
1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass
  Reply
#12
Also, who hear would rather just see one trim level than two? I suppose it works for the Vette and the 911 but I just don't think multiple engine options is the way to go for the RX-7. Make one, make it mo' badasser.

Hmm, how about a 3 rotor....
2018 Ducati Panigale V4

Past: 2018 Honda Civic Type-R, 2015 Yamaha R1, 2009 BMW M3, 2013 Aprilia RSV4R, 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, 2012 Ducati 1199, 2009 Subaru WRX, 2008 CBR1000RR, 2009 Kawasaki ZX-6R, 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2005 Honda CBR600RR, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1996 Acura Integra GS-R, 1997 Honda Civic EX

http://www.aclr8.com
  Reply
#13
I like the 3rd picture best.

As far as all those "photos" I imagine they're either Artist Renditions or some kind of throw-off propoganda. I very seriously doubt that Mazda will make the new '7 that ugly.

Then again, they are owned by Ford. It's a toss up.
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
  Reply
#14
G.Irish Wrote:Maybe it'd be best if you didn't consider me one of you naturally aspirated friends anymore Cry

how very sad

FWIW, I would be a bit surprised if they developed a larger engine instead of boosting the current one to get the most out of their development costs for the current renesis. I would think that'd be cheaper for them, would probably excite more customers, wouldn't make the already poor fuel economy much worse, and would easily get the same HP #'s or better.

And I do like the idea of the normal 7 and the super 7. Although if it were me (and I am), I'd like to see a ~2600lb regular model with the good 'ol renesis that comes from the 8, keep it well under 30k, and the super could get the turbo w/ at least 350HP.

I also can't imagine they'd ditch the awesome styling of the 8. I agree, that black one looks WAY better than the hack job (and more mundane looking) ones above.
  Reply


Forum Jump: