Post your Dyno results, pictures, etc!
#21
TurboOmni08 Wrote:<---- Waiting for all of goodspeed's Dyno videos

I'm going to be putting something together, the car show and karting and a bunch of random vids here and there into a video, hopefully it'll be done sooner rather than later but i'll let you know
Current: '20 Kia Stinger GT2 RWD | '20 Yamaha R3 | '04 Lexus IS300 SD
Past: '94 Mazda RX-7 | '04 Lexus IS300 (RIP) | '00 Jeep XJ | '99 Mazda 10AE Miata | '88 Toyota Supra Turbo

My MM MoviesWatch Them Here
  Reply
#22
BLAIR Wrote:My freind Jakes car- Highest HP car of the day

Mk2 GTI with a vr6 swap- built 3L turbo @14psi (he can run a lot more boost)

heres the vid and graph

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseac...2022498286

Whoa that is way cool.

Talk about sleeper,...you start countin sheep and get slaughtered by a lowered Rabbit.
Current: 1985 LS1 Corvette | 2014 328i Wagon F31
Former: 2010 Ford Edge | 1999 Integra GS
I have a little bit of a rub near lock but if you are turned to lock on a track there are other problems already...
  Reply
#23
Goodspeed can i have the dyno video of my car uncut?!?! that would be awesome

Also, Jack can you post of send me that pic?

I was very happy with the numbers my car put down i actually underestimated it was 220.51hp and 239.15 tq

i dont own a scanner so i wasnt able to put up the graph.
MAWWWWWWERRRRAAARRR!!!!
  Reply
#24
That is of course a boosted MR2 correct? What all is done to it?
Jeff Morrison - Used Car Manager
Woodstock Garage, Inc.
Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep - RAM

Current Stable of Mopar Junk
57 Chrysler Windsor 4drHT - 67 Dodge D100 Short Bed Step Side - 71 Dodge Challenger - 91 Chrysler Lebaron LX 33k mile Survivor - 91 Dodge Dakota V8 - 05 Chrysler Crossfire Roadster - 08 Ram 2500 Cummins
  Reply
#25
l33t Mr2 Wrote:I was very happy with the numbers my car put down i actually underestimated it was 220.51hp and 239.15 tq

I think I met you while you were on the dyno, your car sounded really good! :thumbup:
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a van is a good guy with a van
  Reply
#26
w00t 100th post!

Thanks BlingMW...

TurboOmni-

I wish I knew all your names... but I suck with names.

My engine mods are

2nd Gen JDMzz 3sgte
intercooler
Downpipe
intake
exhaust
MBC @ ~14.5psi

I want a new turbo... the ct-26 is basically maxed out. I am sure I can squeeze out a few more hps but... I am thinking either TD-O6 or T3/T4 or a GTR series turbo.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.twosrus.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=22_54&products_id=130">http://www.twosrus.com/catalog/product_ ... cts_id=130</a><!-- m --> :twisted:
MAWWWWWWERRRRAAARRR!!!!
  Reply
#27
Are you on MR2oc.com? My friend has a red Turbo.
2017 Mineral White BMW M240i Cabriolet
2014 White Platinum Pearl Explorer Sport

Living in the Alamo City.
210
  Reply
#28
Feersty Wrote:Are you on MR2oc.com? My friend has a red Turbo.

Yes Sirrr
MAWWWWWWERRRRAAARRR!!!!
  Reply
#29
my dyno chart:

[Image: 463533993_760196fa79_o.jpg]

hp 115.9
tq 108.6

i have a feeling that my heavy wheels might've affected the hp rating. the previous owner said he dyno'ed the car at 122 whp which i assume had the konig heliums on it (10.8lbs) and now its got the konig rewinds (15.2 lbs).

my car: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxl9ehfoHbU">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxl9ehfoHbU</a><!-- m -->

jeff's van: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE-S3Gff5bA">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE-S3Gff5bA</a><!-- m -->

chan's e30: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XBVT_BO1U">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XBVT_BO1U</a><!-- m -->

i've been super busy, but i'll upload my pics soon. i dont have that many though
1994 Ford Ranger
2004 Honda S2000
2007 BMW X3
  Reply
#30
Maengelito Wrote:i have a feeling that my heavy wheels might've affected the hp rating. the previous owner said he dyno'ed the car at 122 whp which i assume had the konig heliums on it (10.8lbs) and now its got the konig rewinds (15.2 lbs).

Comparing dyno to dyno is, for the most part an exercise in futility.
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
  Reply
#31
.RJ Wrote:
Maengelito Wrote:i have a feeling that my heavy wheels might've affected the hp rating. the previous owner said he dyno'ed the car at 122 whp which i assume had the konig heliums on it (10.8lbs) and now its got the konig rewinds (15.2 lbs).

Comparing dyno to dyno is, for the most part an exercise in futility.
Yep. He could have used a different type of dyno, the temperature could have been more ideal, among a bunch of other things. You can also play around with dyno charts to make them read higher or lower..
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#32
Relative humidity fits in there too.

There are a number of things that affect HP ratings. The dyno's we used at school in north carolina had climate control in the dyno room.

Placement of fans in front of the vehicle can have an effect as well.

Every dyno will give a slightly different reading, just like an air pressure gauge, timing light, and just about every other measurement tool out there.
2014 Tacoma TRD Sport Double cab
2017 Toyota iA/Mazda 2

  Reply
#33
i understand this, but would there be a discrepancy of 7 hp? seems like a lot, but i dont know much about dynos
1994 Ford Ranger
2004 Honda S2000
2007 BMW X3
  Reply
#34
WRXtranceformed Wrote:...the temperature could have been more ideal, among a bunch of other things.

It probably isn't perfect, but isn't that what the SAE correction is supposed to take care of? It assigns a multiplier based on temp and humidity... are we just assuming this is useless? I do understand that different types of dynos might come up with different results, but doesn't this at least solve the problem of using the same dyno on a different day?
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a van is a good guy with a van
  Reply
#35
I don't know if i'd really worry about 7HP - that's not a lot of power - perhaps that guy had better gas in the car tha tday, an octane additive, perhaps the other guy's dyno wasn't accurate/calibrated, etc etc. You'll never know. Perhaps the guy lied to you.
2013 Cadillac ATS....¶▅c●▄███████||▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅▅||█~ ::~ :~ :►
2008 Chevy Malibu LT....▄██ ▲  █ █ ██▅▄▃▂
1986 Monte Carlo SS. ...███▲▲ █ █ ███████
1999 F250 SuperDuty...███████████████████►
1971 Monte Carlo SC ...◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙☼◤
  Reply
#36
Yeah like I said, there are so many factors that it's hard to say what caused the disparity. Usually it's just different dynos. Shit, even a fresh fluid change with good oil / fluids can net you 12hp on the dyno Wink
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#37
As said multiple times by many dyno owners and professional tuners, that they dyno is not something to calculate horsepower, but more of a reference of what youve done between changing things, and different dynos read differently. Mustang Dynos are notoriously off, along with Dynojets being claimed that they rate a little low.

I look at power more by ET on 1/4 mile than dynos, which ive seen many people get 20-30 horsepower off between different dynos. To me, if your trapping 120, 130, 140, 150, that is much more impressive than what you put down on the dyno because it really calculates your useful horsepower.
2020 Ford Raptor
2009 Z06
1986.5 Porsche 928S
  Reply
#38
You won't gain 12hp from changing oil unless you were using tar as a lubricant. Hp gains are all relative also. Maeng's miata might see a 1hp difference in a mod, where Lee's STI might show 6 or more for the exact same mod. I would think a 7 hp difference on a Miata would be a considerable, and noticable, chunk.
  Reply
#39
Dave Wrote:You won't gain 12hp from changing oil unless you were using tar as a lubricant. Hp gains are all relative also. Maeng's miata might see a 1hp difference in a mod, where Lee's STI might show 6 or more for the exact same mod. I would think a 7 hp difference on a Miata would be a considerable, and noticable, chunk.

this is what concerns me. i dont care so much for the 115 i put down, i care more about the 122 that was supposedly put down less than a year before. but if dynos are that off from each other, then i suppose its not terrible. but my wheel weight differences make sense, does it not? i mean, i'm trying to think of all the variables that have changed since i bought the car and the difference in wheel weight seems to be the most drastic, but would it net 7hp?
1994 Ford Ranger
2004 Honda S2000
2007 BMW X3
  Reply
#40
It would be my GUESS that wheel weight would matter 0, or almost 0. Also, look at our runs, they were +/- 5HP each time, so 7 is only slightly above this noise. And there should be a few HP in engine oil alone, maybe you're running a heavier oil than he was? For example:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://silkoleneshop.com/products/oil/engine/15250021.html">http://silkoleneshop.com/products/oil/e ... 50021.html</a><!-- m -->

They showed 7HP difference in oil alone (and yes, they're trying to sell a product, but from what I understand their findings are on par with others)
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a van is a good guy with a van
  Reply


Forum Jump: