05-22-2006, 11:44 PM
Car and Driver is retarded. I don't take those magazine tests seriously either. It's all about the driver, and both the STI and EVO can be driven amazingly or horribly. With the same driver, the EVO does slightly edge out the STI in a road course, but I wouldn't say the STI's performance is "laughable" compared to the EVO. They're very much similar cars in terms of performance.
I personally like the fit and finish of the STI better. Every EVO I've been in has a craptacular interior aside from the seats.
I personally like the fit and finish of the STI better. Every EVO I've been in has a craptacular interior aside from the seats.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks