09-08-2005, 02:00 AM
Mike Wrote:I dont disagree with that, and thats what your companies software is fantastic at Im sure,Evan Wrote:There simply doesnt exist a better high quality compression algorithm at this point than the Divx Pro stuff.
agreed, but divx isn't always a great answer when you're trying to reach a large audience. it is a 3rd party codec that does not come standard with anything. if your user isn't computer-saavy, they won't see your video.
but we are talking about track video, where I can say "you need divx codec to see this get it here" and not worry about alienating 1000 users on some web broadcast. and I dont mind it taking 12 hours while i sleep/work to compress an hour of video, because Im not encoding 50 hours of video at a time.
like i said, we are talking apples and oranges here
your software may be fast, it may stream great, but I gaurantee you it isnt setup for high motion, multi-pass, high resolution video