11-21-2019, 07:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2019, 07:41 PM by CaptainHenreh.)
(11-21-2019, 01:01 PM)Kaan Wrote: for all those that said "they aren't coming for your guns... stop being paranoid" (and you know who you are)... the current legislative definition basically bans all my guns with the exception of my over under, my smallest glock (there is some debate on this), and 22LR plinkers (all the magazines would be banned).
You're just paranoid, Kaan. Nobody is going to make you a felon for some stuff you've owned for 20 fucking years.
(11-21-2019, 01:01 PM)Kaan Wrote: for all those that said "they aren't coming for your guns... stop being paranoid" (and you know who you are)... the current legislative definition basically bans all my guns with the exception of my over under, my smallest glock (there is some debate on this), and 22LR plinkers (all the magazines would be banned).
You're a crazy ammosexual, Kaan! You're right to own a fully semiautomatic assault cannon doesn't DRUMPF my right to feel safe!
Why do you hate children of color, Kaan?
(11-21-2019, 01:01 PM)Kaan Wrote: for all those that said "they aren't coming for your guns... stop being paranoid" (and you know who you are)... the current legislative definition basically bans all my guns with the exception of my over under, my smallest glock (there is some debate on this), and 22LR plinkers (all the magazines would be banned).
Kaan what do you NEED that stuff for anyway? Don't you know that if you HAVE A GUN it's 99% chance it'll be used ON YOU. What well regulated militia do you belong to anyways, and don't say the one outlined in the code of Virginia as every able bodied person from 18 to 50, those are subject to REGULATIONS like banning your evil assault rocket AR47 launcher.
But prayers for hong Kong I wish there was something those poor dears could do why can't they just listen to china
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442