09-25-2018, 10:40 PM
(09-25-2018, 09:36 PM)Evan Wrote:(09-25-2018, 12:05 PM)Apoc Wrote: I like all the people who have never tried to put an infant car seat in a CX-5 or load an infant in a coupe opining about what will or won't work.
I like all the people who have never owned a CX-5 opining about what will or wont work in a CX-5.
I used an infant seat in a cx-5 every day for almost 2 years cumulative (and a rear face convertible for 6+ years) and it worked great, including 8+ hour road trips. But tell me about your drive around the block.
fun fact:
Convertibles are often bigger than infant seats, because while they dont have as much recline angle, they are bigger/longer in general to fit your kid as they get bigger (and its an arms race to fit the widest range of weight/height)
(09-25-2018, 09:06 AM)WRXtranceformed Wrote: another mode of transportation that is somewhat versatile, reliable and doesn't completely suck to drive.
You know the answer. There is a reason the car mags love them
fast enough but not fast, unless you spring for a new one with the turbo.
17k should get you a 2016 grand touring still under warranty.
Very timely you posted that as I came across some super favorable reviews of these today and hadn't even thought about them. The new motor definitely seems like the best way to go, but i wouldn't mind having two Mazdas in the garage
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks

![[Image: p9Q3Vz5.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/p9Q3Vz5.jpg)