10-21-2016, 02:27 PM
Jake Wrote:Every time someone brings up the email thing, I wonder why they don't seem to care about the W Bush administration deleting millions of emails. "But it was years ago!" is not an excuse. She is not the only one who has misused servers and emails, yet she is the only one people care about.
Is GW running for president again and I didn't know it? Should a blind eye be turned to reckless handling of data? My issue isn't deletion, per se. It's that she configured a system to specifically avoid FOIA requests, and then used that system to funnel (potentially) classified data, lied about it, then pretended it wasn't a big deal. You bring up the Bush email thing but HEADS ROLLED for that. It's why AG Gonzales lost his job, along with dozens others. Further, there's no evidence GW himself had anything directly to do with it, though HRC used this server on the reg. It's true she's not the only one who has mishandled data, but does that mean it should be ignored? Dismissed? I guess you're right, at this point what difference does it make?
Jake Wrote:Where do you see a blatant disregard for civil rights, Rex? I'm guessing you'll use that to bring the 2nd Amendment to the forefront, never mind the many other rights that Donald and his cronies believe should be taken away.
That is true, that is one civil right she has no regard for, despite claiming to the contrary. However, as recently as 2013, Hillary has been against same sex marriage, which is presumably something you care about. She wants to dismantle encryption algorithms and essentially criminalize privacy. Is privacy in your communication something you value? Hillary doesn't.
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442