03-23-2016, 11:20 AM
rherold9 Wrote:3.5 seconds to 60 and 200mph isn't fast enough for you? It's priced significantly less than to just under it's main competitorsWRXtranceformed Wrote:THIS IS HOW V8 SHOULD SOUND
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-shows/new-york-auto-show/videos/a28562/heres-what-the-jaguar-f-type-svr-sounds-like-blasting-through-a-tunnel/">http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-shows/n ... -a-tunnel/</a><!-- m -->
I got actual goosebumps
I just hate how the car really isn't that fast for what you spend on it. If it actually had valuable performance for over $100k I'd be intrigued.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks