10-08-2015, 04:41 PM
Jake Wrote:I thought the power to weight concept was kind of understood when talking about a car accelerating. Stephen obviously had his head in the right place. I guess the rrrrrraceeeeekarrrrr drivers get more bent out of shape about the numbers?WRXtranceformed Wrote:Car movement when hitting the gas pedal is relative to what you drive / have driven. You get spoiled when your car moves when you hit the gas pedal. I can appreciate where he is coming from
All about power-to-weight, bruh.
I like a good 500-hp-anything as much as the next guy, but to say that "300 hp is on the bare minimum of acceptable" without also specifying an ideal curb weight is incredibly short-sighted and frankly, meaningless.
My Denali makes 335/385 but weighs as much as the White House. My M3 "only" dynos at 206/212 but doesn't weigh all that much. I guess the GMC is the one with an acceptable level of power though.
It's been a while since I have driven in an E46 M3 and the one I drove in was an SMG but I was really impressed with the overall package. I am sure you will be just fine with the power (to weight and how that affects the acceleration of the vehicle in a straight line from A to B and out of the corners).
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
