For archival purposes.

[SlimKlim]

I'd like to say the point of the post wasn't to win a position, to fight others, or be afraid of running. I was honestly being serious about a new position. The fact in being if another officer that was an officer this year wasn't going to run for office, then I would help with how to do and set up things. I'd Also know when to plan, communicate, etc... but, since there was immediate backlash
there was no point of even keeping the thread open. So, for future reference don't try to run for another position it's a waste of time

Edit: my opinion still stands with what Anthony said. If it hasn't been given a try I don't see why there is so much hate. Obviously, there is and has been trouble with 4. Well tbh we hadn't a clue wtf we were doing at times and we figured it out whether it may not have been the best or the fastest it got done. Yeah, it should be better as officers want the best for the club and to please many as possible. Yes, I think there is a point to where too many is bad but, I don't see a problem with 5-6 officers right now as the club has grown and keeps growing whether co-positions or not. I understand your points though. I'd just hope in the future if there are two good officers running that they both can be an officer. May not be now, but just for later.

Whenever officers feel like they're over their heads, all they have to do is reach out to alumni who have been officers in the past, and they'll be more than happy to provide guidance on how things have been done. For whatever reason no one likes to be proactive and do that, and instead they wait until it's too late people are breathing down their necks.

Has the club grown? What's our count of current student members this year?

I stand by my statements. This is not a branch of a national frat, nor do we have hundreds and hundreds of members. Four passionate and hardworking officers are more than enough to run the club.