The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined array key 0 - Line: 1669 - File: showthread.php PHP 8.2.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 1669 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 915 buildtree




Rental Car Ruckus 2: Electric Boogaloo
I really do have to play the bad guy here a little and say that you may not be entirely fair in your analysis. Why? I feel like you're judging the car for something it was never meant to be. It's not gonna get to 70 before getting off the ramp because it wasn't meant for that kind of performance and actually the guy in the video said that. Quote - "if you're looking for a car to drive that's fun and nimble the Camry is just not for you". So you really can't expect that of it. Also, personally I don't think they look that bad, I like this shape of the Camry alot, much more than the 2013 one. Reading back over the comforts section, you really didn't have anything to complain about so I'll assume that's an A+ there Tongue. Toyota stereos are pretty good for stock, so that easily solves road noise... turn up the radio Big Grin Lots of other stuff are pretty bland and basic, but I think that's half the point in getting a Camry, you know it's going to work regardless of how it looks. If by now you're asking yourself, "does this kid actually like Camry's?" The answer is yes. I like them as a comfy, lofty, reliable, family sedans but not as a sports car or car for any kinds of performance whatsoever, and in that respect, I give the Camry an A+

I read what you said about the 200 not too long ago and I feel like you actually had more to say against the 200 than you did the Camry. Could the Camry have REALLY been that bad? Worse than the 200?? :dunno:
2013 Honda Fit, 1991 Mazda Miata, Princess Blanca, Mystery, 1993 Volvo 940 - sold, 2003 Mazda Protoge5 - carmax'd, 1996 BMW 328is - sold, 1996 Honda Accord - sold
  Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump: