06-05-2009, 05:53 PM
1100+whp on the stock block they claim in that article? GTFO! For what, a whole glorious 3 seconds on the dyno?
I think twin-charging is a cool concept but it's unnecessary. People have done it on STi's just to say they've done it. With a V8 and two turbos, there's no reason why you should lack torque anywhere in the powerband, down low or up high.
I think twin-charging is a cool concept but it's unnecessary. People have done it on STi's just to say they've done it. With a V8 and two turbos, there's no reason why you should lack torque anywhere in the powerband, down low or up high.
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks