08-19-2007, 01:19 PM
Mike Wrote:right. nobody is suggesting he go and do that, but a modern $200 (maybe even less? i don't know the market right now) camera will take perfectly acceptable pics given the photographer knows what he's doing.
my mom has one of those sub-$100 cameras and in the hands of a pro, pics would still suck (kinda like above). washed out, poor sharpness... just belh.
This was my logic, my camera is a no-optical-zoom 3.2MP point'n'shoot. It's our "travel camera" so that we can take pictures and not have to worry about about losing/breaking/destroying our "nice" camera. That plan kind of fell down on my trip out here, because there was a ton of shit to take pictures of.
But I wasn't really looking for feedback, just trying to share the pretty pictures of the blowed-up mountain. When I took pictures @ FoW, I had a much nicer camera, and I think they turned out super, I'm sure the same would have been true here, but I was hardware limited.
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 442