03-24-2007, 07:24 PM
![[Image: STi-vs-Z06_dyno.jpg]](http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b319/mattr762/STi-vs-Z06_dyno.jpg)
Stock C6 Z06: 320ft/lbs @ 2krpms
This is kind of ghetto, but it gives the same idea for a stock C6:
![[Image: 15884.jpg]](http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/dynos/15884.jpg)
Stock C6: 320ft/lbs @ 2krpms
That's what the torque curve for an NA V8 should look like imo. Also, with that much displacement, peak torque and hp numbers should be pretty close to each other.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the ingenuity nor the innovation of that motor, but I am trying to say that that torque curve is not all that impressive to me *for a V8*
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
