Short Term Review: 2008 Sebring Convertible
#1
We spent a week in California so I opted to rent a convertible. Visions of a semi-decent car were dashed when I was presented with the keys to a Chrysler Sebring. I drove it for a week, or about 500 miles, and here are my thoughts.

The Bad

-Horrible, horrible body flex. When you drive down the road at 65 mph, the thing darts all over the highway as it twists in the wind.
-The seats are way too hard. Andy couldn't help but bitch during the hour drive down to Laguna, although he had no problem sleeping in it on the way home. FWIW, my wife's grandmother loved them for "their support" so that might say something about their target demographic.
-The steering was like trying to walk on pudding. It was mushy and offered no real resistance or feedback.
-The interior, while better than previous versions, still felt plastic. To quote Andy, "Sitting in this car, you can't help but see why Chrysler is failing."
-The brakes. See steering.
-Security, or lack there of. You want to grab a bite to eat but not waste 30 seconds putting the top back up. You put your stuff in the trunk so it won't be stolen but then realize there's a trunk release button high up on the dash, right next to the driver's window. Does the button get disabled when you lock the doors and/or have the top down? Of course not. So while your stuff is out of sight, it's never out of reach of persistent thieves.
-Road noise was pretty loud with the top up. I haven't been in many convertibles so I can't comment if that's par for the course.
-To go from carrying luggage to having the top down, you have to open the trunk and flip down a barrier. It's supposed to tell you how much luggage you can put in when the top is down but in the up position, it prevents the top from lowering.
-There is no internal hand hold to help with closing the trunk. This wouldn't be a problem except that when it's open, the top of the lid is about 6.5-7' off the ground. Not a big deal if you're a 5'10" guy but definitely a problem if you're a 5'4" woman.


The Good

+The fully automatic top was nice and did what we asked of it.
+Gas mileage was in the high 20s in mixed driving. Considering the hills of California and the wildly inefficient tranny, I was surprised by this.


The Bottom Line

It worked for a week and served its purpose as convertible transportation, but I can't imagine being cursed with it for much longer than that. It feels like Chrysler didn't think everything out, or no one that designs the car has actually driven one for any length of time. I can understand that it's a cheap car for the masses, so I'd forgive the non-enthusiast things like brakes and steering, but I really can't excuse "the little things" that add up to make for a poorly designed car.
'76 911S | '14 328xi | '17 GTI | In memoriam: '08 848, '85 944

"Here, at last, is the cure for texting while driving. The millions of deaths which occur every year due to the iPhone’s ability to stream the Kim K/Ray-J video in 4G could all be avoided, every last one of them, if the government issued everyone a Seventies 911 and made sure they always left the house five minutes later than they’d wanted to. It would help if it could be made to rain as well. Full attention on the road. Guaranteed." -Jack Baruth
  Reply
#2
Oh man don't let Jeff see this thread!!
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004

2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium

Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
  Reply
#3
Apoc Wrote:The Good
....
The things that functioned as designed
+The fully automatic top was nice and did what we asked of it.
+Gas mileage was in the high 20s in mixed driving. Considering the hills of California and the wildly inefficient tranny, I was surprised by this.

Fixed that for you Wink
When it comes to Ryan Jenkins, the story ends with me putting him in the wall.

2009 Speed Triple | 2006 DR-Z400SM | 1999 CBR600F4 | 1998 Jeep Cherokee

-Ginger
  Reply
#4
WRXtranceformed Wrote:Oh man don't let Jeff see this thread!!

:roll:
Jeff Morrison - Used Car Manager
Woodstock Garage, Inc.
Chrysler - Dodge - Jeep - RAM

Current Stable of Mopar Junk
57 Chrysler Windsor 4drHT - 67 Dodge D100 Short Bed Step Side - 71 Dodge Challenger - 91 Chrysler Lebaron LX 33k mile Survivor - 91 Dodge Dakota V8 - 05 Chrysler Crossfire Roadster - 08 Ram 2500 Cummins
  Reply
#5
I still contend that the Sebring rental I had was the worst car I've ever driven. And for the record, I have driven a Yugo - yes, the Sebring was worse than that...
05 S/C "Elixige"
07 Mazda 3S - commuter car
99 YZF-600R - commuter bike
  Reply
#6
John, I'm with you.
I Am Mike
4 wheels:  '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)

No longer onyachin.
  Reply
#7
My parents "upgraded" us to a last-gen Sebring vert when we were in Hawaii a few years ago. I thought it was a decent car (considering the other options at Hertz!), but they are definitely NOT sports cars in any way, shape, or form.

For the four days we had it, it was cooler than a Taurus/Impala/Malibu would have been...
Now:
'16 Ram 1500 | '97 BMW M3 | Some Press Loan

Then:
87 BMW 325e | 91 BMW 535i | 96 BMW 328i | 95 BMW 325i | 95 Mazda Miata | 13 Focus ST | 09 BMW 128i | 00 Pontiac Firebird | 05 Yukon Denali | 96 BMW 328iC | 11 Ford F-150 | 06 BMW M3 | 10 Range Rover SC | '03 Ford Ranger | '18 Ford F-150 | '01 BMW X5 | '98 Volvo S70 T5M
  Reply


Forum Jump: