The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Madison Motorsports
Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - Printable Version

+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? (/showthread.php?tid=7432)

Pages: 1 2


Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - WRXtranceformed - 06-30-2008

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/30/doomsdaycollider.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/06/30/doom ... index.html</a><!-- m -->

Shit am I just really drunk or am I the only one who can't figure out what's going on here?? Micro black holes, strangelets? Wtf? Are we gonna get sucked into some artificial black hole?? All I know is between stuff like this and the speculated war on Iran, my prediction of the world ending in 2012 is coming closer and closer to reality!!


- CaptainHenreh - 07-01-2008

This is all just lame media sensationalism.

You know what's going to happen when the LHC gets turned on? Some very very tiny stuff is going to crash into some other very very tiny stuff. That's it. We won't notice.

IF the LHC can create a tiny black hole, it will be very tiny, it will decay very quickly, and it will pose no threat to the earth or it's citizens. And that's *if* it can create one, which is kind of unlikely. We'd have to do some pretty significant revisions to the standard model of physics to allow for this.

And strangelets? Please. So CNN is afraid that a well-defined and practiced process will result in the creation of a (so-far) 100% theoretical matter, AND that this theoretical matter will react with normal matter in a 100% totally-made-up-with-little-basis-in-reality (so far) way.

You might as well worry that Zombie Robot Hitler will rise from his bunker under the arctic ice and conquer the world with his vampire army.

The biggest risk of the LHC is an accident that could hurt a few people at the facility.


- .RJ - 07-01-2008

So what happens when they cross the streams?


- ScottyB - 07-01-2008

.RJ Wrote:So what happens when they cross the streams?

they go plaid


- CaptainHenreh - 07-01-2008

ScottyB Wrote:
.RJ Wrote:So what happens when they cross the streams?

they go plaid

This is why we can't have nice things.

[Image: science.jpg]


- Maengelito - 07-01-2008

CaptainHenreh Wrote:You might as well worry that Zombie Robot Hitler will rise from his bunker under the arctic ice and conquer the world with his vampire army.

fuck, what do we do?


- CaptainHenreh - 07-01-2008

Maengelito Wrote:
CaptainHenreh Wrote:You might as well worry that Zombie Robot Hitler will rise from his bunker under the arctic ice and conquer the world with his vampire army.

fuck, what do we do?

Pray to die first, Maeng.


- Maengelito - 07-01-2008

It was a good run everybody. I'll see you all in hell!


- Goodspeed - 07-01-2008

CaptainHenreh Wrote:
Maengelito Wrote:fuck, what do we do?

Pray to die first, Maeng.

Not if you install one of these in your home. Haven't we learned anything from the zombie thread?

[Image: 4982-450x-zombie_1.jpg]

[Image: 4984-450x-zombie_4.jpg]

[Image: 4989-450x-zombie_9.jpg]

[Image: 4991-450x-zombie_11.jpg]


- CaptainHenreh - 07-01-2008

A shotgun will not stop Zombie Robot Hitler or his army of vampires.

Once again, goodspeed dies at the beginning of the apocalypse.


- JackoliciousLegs - 07-01-2008

[Image: hl2-2005-07-11-17-35-28-53.jpg]


- Goodspeed - 07-01-2008

CaptainHenreh Wrote:A shotgun will not stop Zombie Robot Hitler or his army of vampires.

Once again, goodspeed dies at the beginning of the apocalypse.

Pssh, going out in a blaze of glory is still better than praying to "die first". I'd rather die fighting than cowering in a puddle of my own excrement in an abandoned cabin somewhere. Bring it on Zombie Robot Hitler!


- WRXtranceformed - 09-21-2008

Epic fail. I'd hate to be the bean counters on this project.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/09/20/hadron.collider.damage.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/09 ... index.html</a><!-- m -->


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - WRXtranceformed - 03-31-2010

So this thing is finally starting to work. This is something interesting that I hadn't heard about before that was posted on another board. I have no idea if any of these ideas are actually correct because I haven't done the research myself, but it sounds interesting the kind of resistance the LHC is getting from other scientists aside from the creation of a black hole theory.

Quote:Black hole? There's been a lot of speculation on this and some scientists are pretty worried about it. There have been TONS of problems with the collider in the last few years, which have caused VERY significant delays and setbacks. As a result I believe it'll be only running at partial power for a couple of years and then shut down for a year of maintenance and then fired back up towards full power after that.

Many people have suggested that the future is actually causing the problems and desperately trying to prevent us from completing the project and operating it at full power. "Holger Bech Nielsen of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto wonder if it isn't bad luck at all, but future influences rippling back to sabotage them. In papers like "Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal" and "Search for Future Influence From LHC," they put forth the notion that observing the Higgs boson would be such an abhorrent event that the future is actually trying to prevent it from happening."

If you look at the proposed timelines and such it'll be getting towards full power near the end of 2012. It's thought that the future exists and it's preventing us from using this at full power, but can only prevent it for so long. On that note, it's suggested that the future ceases to exist in 2013, which then offers no prevention and allows us to finally complete the collider and bring it to full operating power in 2012, which causes the end of the world and no 2013 (preventing force).

As much as I doubt this is the Doomsday Device I'm not so sure I'm fully on board with nothing at all negative happening when we're smashing together particles like this. The reason being is...none of these scientists know exactly what's going to happen. There are no ways to test theories in experimental particle physics except to just smash them together and see what happens. I really do feel like there could become a point when technology exceeds our grasp and we're in way over our heads.


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - WRXtranceformed - 03-31-2010

This article has a video at the top that I found was the best explanation for what this thing does in layman's terms.

The Large Hadron Collider: Questions and Answers - Telegraph

I also find it really interesting that in experimental particle physics, scientists can theorize but they really don't know what's going to happen until they just smash them together and find out. This is all uncharted territory really, which is true for most experimental science...but I can see how it lends credence to theories that we could be fucking with technology and physics forces that are way beyond our means to control.

A random bit of info from some smart person I found.

Quote:Complexity of the Universe does not seem to be the problem affecting the LHC. The problem is that the effects of actually concentrating that much energy into such a small space/time could have repercussions that scientists do not yet understand. Much like a child sticking a metal object into a light socket; this LHC could possibly produce unfathomable results for which the LHC facility is not capable of shielding from or controlling.

What is meant by future sabatoge is that whatever effects this collision produced in a future that actually allowed it to occurr has led to a problem so great, that somehow someone is able to A) either see the future caused by this experiment and subtly introduce such problems as to prevent it from happening or B) an entity from the future is intercepting its own doomed fate. This is opposite of the "kill grandpa" effect in that the entities future/existence depends on not allowing this event to occurr in the first place.

As scientific minds continue to ponder how to prevent this effect from happening, such as reducing the number of people with access to the site, it will become more and more difficult to prevent the consequences which will result from that collision experiment.

Scientists as of yet are still pondering whether or not string theory has any validity, and cannot figure out what it means to have empty space expand, while matter does not seem itself to be expanding (ie the earth is not getting bigger as space itself expands) as space is. Add to this problem of the acceleration issue and nothing makes sense.

Maybe it would make more sense if gravity itself were not thought be a force which attracts, but rather space as having a force which repels matter from all sides. No one has been able to actually demonstrate that gravity is not instantaneous, and since certain particle behaviour has shown an ability to affect one another instantaneously, it cannot be ruled out that gravity itself is the result of a weak yet constant push from space itself.

If this were to be true, and space itself was pushing matter together, clumping it into black holes, massive stars and planets, then who is to say that the fact that space is creating ever larger vacuums is not leading to this force getting stronger- directly resulting in an accerating expansion rate.

The more matter combines to form ever larger clumps, the stronger the repelling force against space. And if the LHC is successful at creating a local atmosphere similar to the alleged Big Bang; a cataclysmic local creation of space could blow part of the earth apart knocking the rest of the planet off course in its orbit. And that folks, is what our little time traveling gremlin friends are trying to prevent.



Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - Mike - 03-31-2010

so let's stop innovating and moving forward. fuck it. power the bitch up!


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - CaptainHenreh - 03-31-2010

In other news, Zombie Robot Hitler stirs in his frozen slumber...


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - TorinoCobra070 - 03-31-2010

I'm all for firing this big nasty bitch up and running full power. I can't wait to see what happens :thumbup:


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - Evan - 03-31-2010

Im as big of a science geek as anybody, but those articles do have a point. Throwing obscene amounts of energy at particles with the goal of reproducing the creation of time and space, and having no clue what it will actually do doesnt seem like good responsible science.


Re: Protons neutrons electrons oh my?!? - CaptainHenreh - 03-31-2010

Then you clearly aren't that big of a science geek. All this talk about "reproducing the big bang" is just sensationalism. We're smashing particles together. We've been doing that for decades, we're just doing it bigger then we could earlier.

It's not like we've got a half dozen rogue particle physicists running around trying to blow up the planet for pete's sake. It's fucking CERN.