The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Madison Motorsports
Automotive News Discussion - Printable Version

+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Automotive News Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=10527)



Re: Automotive News Discussion - Senor_Taylor - 06-21-2016

Beej Wrote:
Senor_Taylor Wrote:That said. I understand the shifter may be confusing, but to leave it in neutral would mean that the driver made effort to put it in Park. They just assumed neutral was park, right? It would be different if you had to leave it in neutral and then do something else, but in this car, you still shift all the way up to park, then the shifter returns to neutral. Bad design, but I wouldn't think FCA is at fault. That is driver error.
I think I have the shifter in question, and the "gears" don't have designated positions. You nudge the shifter back to go from P-R-N-D, and nudge it forward to go in the opposite direction - and there's a button you need to push to make change-of-direction moves.

It's actually pretty easy to nudge it from D with the intent of going to P, while winding up in N or R - usually when you don't push the button hard or early enough. There is a super forward "nudge point" (?) when you go up to P, but it's not that different from regular forward and yeah...easy to miss.
I see. The article didn't really make it clear how bad it was. My mistake.

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - rherold9 - 06-21-2016

Does the cluster not tell you what you are in N, D, P, R?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - SlimKlim - 06-21-2016

Yeah those electronic shifters are getting more and more common too. That new A4 Mike brought to the car show had one and it just felt odd to use. You instictively push it forward for park which is actually reverse, because that's been moved to a button on the knob. BMW has been doing it for a while too with that weird silver beer tap/dildo looking thing, I'm pretty sure I've moved some cars around that have them but I don't really remember what they are like to use.

Maybe I'm just a luddite like the rest of you but I really appreciate that VW resisted the urge to reinvent the wheel with the DSG shifter. Sure it could look more sporty and special if it sorta-kinda mimicked the pattern of a manual like the old SMG shifters, but I like the simplicity of the good ole PRND/S/M arrangement with a physical "slot" for each position. Also gives you the benefit of being able to toss the keys to your wife/mom/grandpa/preacher with no special instructions required.

On a similar note does anyone else feel like in a few years all these new cars are gonna get stranded in their parking spots when the electronic parking brakes stick on? The North American market lucked out with the GTI because VW couldn't figure out how to get an electronic one in it like the Euro cars and stay under budget, so we just get an old fashioned handle. Something that would prevent the car from moving (or let it roll away) if it failed is pretty much the last thing I want to rely on VW electronics for.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - JPolen01 - 06-21-2016

The cx5 has an electronic parking brake. I never use it except once in a while in a steep hill. Never thought about it failing and sticking but anything is a possibility.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - rherold9 - 06-21-2016

I mean I hope with electronic there would be a manual release somewhere....

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - Beej - 06-21-2016

rherold9 Wrote:Does the cluster not tell you what you are in N, D, P, R?
The fact that I had to think about it means I'm not in the habit of looking there. Yeah it's in the cluster and the letters on the shift lever also illuminate which gear you're in. I guess I (and apparently most people, if they recalled the damn thing...I did get a chuckle when we got the letter) just don't look there.

That century of stopping the car, slamming it into P, and gtfo'ing without a thought of the car going on a murderous rampage has really caught up with society.

Chalk me up in favor of the mechanical parking brake while we're at it.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - rherold9 - 06-21-2016

Beej Wrote:
rherold9 Wrote:Does the cluster not tell you what you are in N, D, P, R?
The fact that I had to think about it means I'm not in the habit of looking there. Yeah it's in the cluster and the letters on the shift lever also illuminate which gear you're in. I guess I (and apparently most people, if they recalled the damn thing...I did get a chuckle when we got the letter) am just not in the habit of checking things like that.

That century of stopping the car, slamming it into P, and gtfo'ing without a thought of the car going on a murderous rampage has really caught up with society.

Chalk me up in favor of the mechanical parking brake while we're at it.

I guess I'm weird then. I always check the cluster in an automatic to make sure it is in the right place.... I mean that is part of driving and all. I don't care if it take 9 button clicks, 10 jumping jacks, and the macarena. Checking the cluster should be a no brainer. Then again not many people realize you have the highest chance of killing someone or dying while driving. Everyone's distracted these days or just don't care on the road.

Not trying to be a dick at all just my 2 cents.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - Senor_Taylor - 06-21-2016

rherold9 Wrote:
Beej Wrote:
rherold9 Wrote:Does the cluster not tell you what you are in N, D, P, R?
The fact that I had to think about it means I'm not in the habit of looking there. Yeah it's in the cluster and the letters on the shift lever also illuminate which gear you're in. I guess I (and apparently most people, if they recalled the damn thing...I did get a chuckle when we got the letter) am just not in the habit of checking things like that.

That century of stopping the car, slamming it into P, and gtfo'ing without a thought of the car going on a murderous rampage has really caught up with society.

Chalk me up in favor of the mechanical parking brake while we're at it.

I guess I'm weird then. I always check the cluster in an automatic to make sure it is in the right place.... I mean that is part of driving and all. I don't care if it take 9 button clicks, 10 jumping jacks, and the macarena. Checking the cluster should be a no brainer. Then again not many people realize you have the highest chance of killing someone or dying while driving. Everyone's distracted these days or just don't care on the road.

Not trying to be a dick at all just my 2 cents.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Is this common to have it on the dash? Must be a new car thing because the only automatics I've driven with it on the dash were pickups with the shifter on the tree.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - rherold9 - 06-21-2016

Senor_Taylor Wrote:Is this common to have it on the dash? Must be a new car thing because the only automatics I've driven with it on the dash were pickups with the shifter on the tree.
Well I can't say for all cars, but the cars I've driven from late 90s and on, yes.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - SlimKlim - 06-21-2016

You're also a massive car nerd.

An overworked mother of 3 doesn't expect to have to verify that her Grand Cherokee is in park, when for her entire driving career she slams the shifter thing in its most forward and/or up position and gets out of the car knowing its not going to go anywhere. I think it's one of those things that seems incredibly simple and easy to avoid, because it kind of is. Then you think of how 99% of people use their cars, how they have developed a muscle memory of slamming something in park over the last 20-40 years and being able to trust that it's not going anywhere, you can't blame someone for doing the same thing in one of these cars and hopping out.

I normally land on the side of "the consumer is the problem" with stuff like this, but I think in this case manufacturers have the responsibility to make sure they are selling idiot proof designs. Being thoughtless or in a hurry or not-enough-of-a-car-nerd shouldn't be punishable by death.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - rherold9 - 06-21-2016

SlimKlim Wrote:You're also a massive car nerd.

An overworked mother of 3 doesn't expect to have to verify that her Grand Cherokee is in park, when for her entire driving career she slams the shifter thing in its most forward and/or up position and gets out of the car knowing its not going to go anywhere. I think it's one of those things that seems incredibly simple and easy to avoid, because it kind of is. Then you think of how 99% of people use their cars, how they have developed a muscle memory of slamming something in park over the last 20-40 years and being able to trust that it's not going anywhere, you can't blame someone for doing the same thing in one of these cars and popping out.

I normally land on the side of "the consumer is the problem" with stuff like this, but I think in this case manufacturers have the responsibility to make sure they are selling idiot proof designs. Being thoughtless or in a hurry or not-enough-of-a-car-nerd shouldn't be punishable by death.
Lols, very true. The difference between the average driver and someone who actually is a car enthusiast is huge. It's sad that there needs to be idiot proofing is kind of what I'm trying to get at. Especially with how much responsibility a vehicle and driving is... then again some people don't even know how to check tire pressures or fill tires with air.

Oh well, I doubt it is going to change because Merica' and shit so I'll stop bitching.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - ScottyB - 06-21-2016

i'm with Adam and Joey...its just like how there's no "rule" that the turn signal stalk is on one side of the column and not the other, but everyone does it because its been a part of car operation for so long that it makes sense and its intuitive. there's no reason to dick around with the shift pattern on something that's been established for 80 years.

i don't think it totally relieves someone of the ability to understand how the basic functions of their car work, but i don't blame anyone for not getting something like that right when it deviates from the norm to the point that its no longer a simple process to just put the stupid car in park.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - BLINGMW - 06-21-2016

Can we just agree that all automatics are dangerous and we should be working to outlaw them? Won't someone think of the children? Only the government mandated 6 speed manual shifter with reverse up and to the left will be allowed.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - ScottyB - 06-21-2016

BLINGMW Wrote:Only the government mandated 6 speed manual shifter with reverse up and to the left will be allowed.

#MakeManuelGreatAgain


Re: Automotive News Discussion - Sully - 06-22-2016

Speaking of idiot proofing cars, did we ever discuss the stories of people trying to sue and get them to change push button ignitions because they would pull into their garage, shut the door and go in the house and forget they were in a running car because there was no key to remove. Like how would a key make a difference if you can't remember you're in a running car? Part of the problem is we as a society don't allow natural selection anymore. Back in the day, if you were stupid enough to do that, you probably died and society carried on with only people who weren't that stupid. Now we catered to those stupid people and change the way things work so people can't Darwin themselves. And now we have a bunch of stupid people (ie: see 2016 presidential candidates that people actually think are a good idea)

Note: my comments are in no way aimed towards the recent jeep thing. That is very sad and those shifters were probably a bad idea/cheaper to handle lawsuits then redesigns type deal.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


Re: Automotive News Discussion - JPolen01 - 06-23-2016

And what they should have done from the beginning is coming soon. What a colossal fuck up on the design team's part.

Autopark feature to be installed on 1.1 million Fiat-Chrysler vehicles. <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jalopnik.com/this-might-be-fiat-chryslers-fix-for-its-rollaway-jeeps-1782399767">http://jalopnik.com/this-might-be-fiat- ... 1782399767</a><!-- m -->


Re: Automotive News Discussion - G.Irish - 06-23-2016

Sully Wrote:Part of the problem is we as a society don't allow natural selection anymore. Back in the day, if you were stupid enough to do that, you probably died and society carried on with only people who weren't that stupid. Now we catered to those stupid people and change the way things work so people can't Darwin themselves. And now we have a bunch of stupid people (ie: see 2016 presidential candidates that people actually think are a good idea)

It's all relative. People from today would struggle if they suddenly found themselves living in the 1800's. Someone from the 1800's would struggle in the dark ages. Someone from the dark ages would starve in hunter gatherer groups. Every step of the way technology has allowed people to not worry about basic skills, but in return they can use their time and energy on cooler shit like reading and writing books, sailing across oceans, or internet porn.

Do more stupid people survive than would have before? Probably, but a stupid person today is probably a lot smarter than the average person 100 years ago, so maybe it's a net gain. However, it's probably easier for stupid people to assemble in large groups and create bigger fuckups now than it was earlier in history.


Re: Automotive News Discussion - CaptainHenreh - 06-23-2016

G.Irish Wrote:Do more stupid people survive than would have before? Probably, but a stupid person today is probably a lot smarter than the average person 100 years ago, so maybe it's a net gain. However, it's probably easier for stupid people to assemble in large groups and create bigger fuckups now than it was earlier in history.


Kurzgesagt had a interesting video on this very topic today:
[youtube]dGiQaabX3_o[/youtube]


Re: Automotive News Discussion - *insertusernamehere* - 06-23-2016

G.Irish Wrote:, or internet porn.

.
Heh yeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaa


Re: Automotive News Discussion - JPolen01 - 06-27-2016

History has cancelled Top Gear USA. Still to be seen if another network picks it up, but I doubt it. I've tried to watch the show a handful of times and it always just strikes me as stupid. In my opinion Rutledge, Tanner Faust, and Adam (who is this guy?) are not good comedians or presenters and generally don't mesh well. I think that some of the charm of the original Top Gear was the British accents and dry comedy (to an American at least).

So long Top Gear USA, you sucked most of the time anyway.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://jalopnik.com/top-gear-usa-apparently-canceled-by-history-channel-1782663776">http://jalopnik.com/top-gear-usa-appare ... 1782663776</a><!-- m -->