Impeachment Proceedings in the House

The following warnings occurred:

Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.28 (Linux)

File	Line	Function
/inc/class_error.php	153	errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code	2	errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php	287	eval
/printthread.php	117	printthread_multipage

Impeachment Proceedings in the House - Printable Version

+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Impeachment Proceedings in the House (/showthread.php?tid=7474)

Pages: 1 2 3

- Evan - 07-17-2008

JackoliciousLegs Wrote:
Evan Wrote:The Republicans didnt impeach Clinton for going to war in the Balkans without congressional approval and lying about the justification for it, so the inverse justification certainly doesnt apply
Good point... kinda. Duration of that one was 77 days and only 7,000 troops were deployed. Only 2 died.

4100 Americans dead in Iraq... and counting.

sure, but what is on trial here, the decision or the effects of the decision?

JackoliciousLegs Wrote:
Evan Wrote:The Democrats want to play the "Smear Bush" game
It's not getting ANY media coverage. That's the only real fucking article out on this shit. It's all bloggers covering it.

The democratic leadership said impeachment is off the table... those spineless bastehds.

yeah, thats really strange, especially considering the media's enthusiasm in always jumping on any bush bashing that they can. I can only imagine that since it isnt an impeachment that its further down on the priority list.

And looks like CNN has its usual array of Obama puff peices on the front page that take priority Wink

- HAULN-SS - 07-17-2008

CNN "category counts"
Barack Obama:1996
John McCain:1106

Weird how that is.

- Ole - 07-17-2008

You guys sure do like to argue about things.......

- Maengelito - 07-17-2008

Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......

I don't agree with that :!:

- Hunter - 07-17-2008

HAULN-SS Wrote:CNN "category counts"
Barack Obama:1996
John McCain:1106

Weird how that is.

But realize those numbers are a bit skewed because Obama was battling hillary for the nomination until about a month ago, while not much was happening on the McCain front.

- G.Irish - 07-17-2008

Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......

If people were allowed to have sex with dead bodies and goats in peace and agree that English is the bestest people wouldn't argue so much.

- ViPER1313 - 07-17-2008

G.Irish Wrote:
Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......
If people were allowed to have sex with dead bodies and goats in peace and agree that English is the bestest people wouldn't argue so much.

I disagree.

- JackoliciousLegs - 07-17-2008

G.Irish Wrote:
Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......
If people were allowed to have sex with dead bodies and goats in peace and agree that English is the bestest people wouldn't argue so much.

I agree.

- CaptainHenreh - 07-17-2008

You guys are both retarded.

And wrong.

- JackoliciousLegs - 07-17-2008

CaptainHenreh Wrote:You guys are both retarded.

And wrong.

You obviously know nothing about the subject.

- HAULN-SS - 07-17-2008

Hunter Wrote:
HAULN-SS Wrote:CNN "category counts"
Barack Obama:1996
John McCain:1106

Weird how that is.
But realize those numbers are a bit skewed because Obama was battling hillary for the nomination until about a month ago, while not much was happening on the McCain front.

While I do realize that, it is still a huge disparity. Hillary still has more articles, and she's been out of the race for a month and a half.

- JackoliciousLegs - 07-17-2008

At least the forum's active again :dunno:

- mrbaggio - 07-17-2008

I'm just glad we can speak english, or how would we ever argue?

- Steve85 - 07-17-2008

mrbaggio Wrote:I'm just glad we can speak english, or how would we ever argue?

clicking

- JackoliciousLegs - 07-17-2008

Babelfish?

French: Vous avez tort
JAAAAGERMAN!!!: Sie sind falsch
Italian: Siete errato
Japanese: 間違っている
Spanish: Usted es incorrecto

Finally, English: You are gravely mistaken and misinformed on the subject dear ole' chap.

- G.Irish - 07-17-2008

ViPER1313 Wrote:
G.Irish Wrote:
Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......
If people were allowed to have sex with dead bodies and goats in peace and agree that English is the bestest people wouldn't argue so much.

I disagree.

Clearly you hate America and our freedom (to sodomize dead animals).

- mrbaggio - 07-17-2008

Steve85 Wrote:
mrbaggio Wrote:I'm just glad we can speak english, or how would we ever argue?

clicking

We have covered this. Clicking cannot be understood by english speakers. Therefore it is not even a real language.

- ViPER1313 - 07-17-2008

G.Irish Wrote:
ViPER1313 Wrote:
G.Irish Wrote:
Ole Wrote:You guys sure do like to argue about things.......
If people were allowed to have sex with dead bodies and goats in peace and agree that English is the bestest people wouldn't argue so much.

I disagree.
Clearly you hate America and our freedom (to sodomize dead animals).

All this coming from a guy who works for Osama and eats baby puppies as lunchtime snacks. Ask yourself - can you trust a man who starts a sentence with "Clearly?"

- Evan - 07-17-2008

clicking does not ahere to web standards and therefore sucks.

- ViPER1313 - 07-17-2008

Code:
<xml>  

 <click>clickclickclickclick----click</click>