+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: w00t? (/showthread.php?tid=2)
- Chris - 01-22-2004
RJ I never see you with the same car, good choice but not as BLING as Maeng
- Dave - 01-22-2004
So, what's her name?
- .RJ - 01-22-2004
I dont give my cars female names.
- Dragon - 01-22-2004
I give it 2 weeks before it's jacked.
- .RJ - 01-22-2004
Eat shit
- Evan - 01-22-2004
Dragon Wrote:I give it 2 weeks before it's jacked.me too, if he insists on pimping it around
- Mike - 01-22-2004
Evan Wrote:Dragon Wrote:I give it 2 weeks before it's jacked.me too, if he insists on pimping it around
Seriously, do you really think he's gonna be driving the Accord much? Even if he does he's going to hate it.
- Dragon - 01-22-2004
MichaelJComputer Wrote:Not to mention Mommy won't let him keep it in the garage forever, she's gonna start complaining about having to move her car every time he wants to drive it.Evan Wrote:Dragon Wrote:I give it 2 weeks before it's jacked.me too, if he insists on pimping it around
Seriously, do you really think he's gonna be driving the Accord much? Even if he does he's going to hate it.
- .RJ - 01-22-2004
And that right there is precisely the deterrent that will keep me from driving it much.
- Sijray21 - 01-22-2004
JackoliciousLegs Wrote:makes me almost miss my GSR...
i'd like a GSR....mmm, .2L more displacement...mmmm
Nice - Feersty - 01-22-2004
Quote:
Quote:.RJ it looks nice and all but why cant we get more pictures of it.
- JackoliciousLegs - 01-22-2004
no more 1.8 liters... i guess i'll have to deal with a 1.3... DAMN
- Dave - 01-22-2004
your 1.3 is up for debate. Though the 7's rotary is rated at 1.3, that is only the displacement of one rotary. Since you are a twin rotary, doesn't that make your displacement twice as much, hence 2.6? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt that you have the giant acceleration gap of a 1.3, but I also doubt that you get the kind of gas mileage a 1.3 would get (course, rotaries aren't exactly known for thier gas mileage anyways
) I'd take a 1.8L I4 over yours, if it didn't have a turbo on it 
- Mike - 01-22-2004
Yeah, the RX# guys are notorious for saying they only have 1.3 liters and blah blah blah they are so fast with so little. The realists seem to admit it is 2.6 or whatever.
- .RJ - 01-22-2004
Heh, well if its blowed up, it doesnt matter what size it is
- JackoliciousLegs - 01-22-2004
mathematically, there's a .74blah blah multiplier. Realistically, it should put out HP of a 2.3 liter. I'd take an NA 2nd gen over any civic.
- JackoliciousLegs - 01-22-2004
Dave Wrote:your 1.3 is up for debate. . . Since you are a twin rotary, doesn't that make your displacement twice as much, hence 2.6? Correct me if I'm wrong...1.3 liters between both housings. Each housing w/ rotor in the 13b is like 648cc.. i believe
- ScottyB - 01-22-2004
bah. my turbo rotary mustang GTR with pistons runs 12's, holla
- Mike - 01-22-2004
JackoliciousLegs Wrote:I'd take an NA 2nd gen over any civic.
Over a B18C1 or C5 hatch? I guess that's cool... If you like being slow.
- ScottyB - 01-22-2004
Over a B18C1 or C5 hatch? I guess that's cool... If you like being slow.[/quote]
oh snap!
p.s rwd ownz