+- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org)
+-- Forum: Technical (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Technical Discussion (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: SH Prelude (/showthread.php?tid=1453)
Pages:
1
2
- ScottyB - 12-10-2004
it seems unfortunate too that most of these high tech traction/handling systems carry a weight penalty as well. in almost every case i feel like the weight offsets the benefit of the system, like with the old SUPER HICAS rws system (sorry John...ps i still love Z's)
- Dave - 12-10-2004
eh, HICAS is alright, but in the end it's just something else expensive to break and have to remove or repair. If I had HICAS on the 240, i'd tear it out for weight savings, simplicity, and possibly getting money back.
If I remember correctly, John took it out of the 300 as well.
- JohnC - 12-10-2004
Dave Wrote:If I remember correctly, John took it out of the 300 as well.
Yup.
- Chris - 12-10-2004
well good stuff, glad to have learned more about the SH. Sounds like its nice for a twisty backroad, but if it can't function properly in an autox then it doesn't seem worth it. If I had one, it would def be an autox car but wouldn't see the track.
- Dave - 12-10-2004
Chris Wrote:If I had one, it would def be an autox car but wouldn't see the track.Easy to say right now!
- Chris - 12-10-2004
Dave Wrote:Chris Wrote:If I had one, it would def be an autox car but wouldn't see the track.Easy to say right now!
HAH! I know, look at Maeng's Sti.
- Mike - 12-10-2004
Chris Wrote:Dave Wrote:Chris Wrote:If I had one, it would def be an autox car but wouldn't see the track.Easy to say right now!
HAH! I know, look at Maeng's Sti.
exactly what i was going to bring up.